Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Gawker Editors Craggs and Read Quit After Management Yanks Controversial Conde Nast Post

In exit memos, Max Read and Tommy Craggs condemned Friday’s decision.

Asa Mathat

Last week, Gawker Media proprietor Nick Denton tried to put out a fire by deleting Gawker’s controversial post that outed Conde Nast’s CFO for attempting to hire a male prostitute.

As it turns out, he may have just dumped gasoline on it, as Gawker Media Executive Editor Tommy Craggs and Gawker.com Editor in Chief Max Read said they’re leaving the company.

Craggs condemned the managing partnership’s vote to yank the post in a memo sent to editorial staff announcing his resignation. That managing partnership — an executive committee which until today consisted of Craggs, Denton, chief counsel and president Heather Dietrick, ads boss Andrew Gorenstein, chief strategy officer Erin Pettigrew and COO Scott Kidder — voted 4-2 on Friday (with Craggs and Dietrick dissenting) to remove the article.

“No one told me the vote was actually happening, by the way. It just … happened, while I was on a plane to California,” Craggs wrote. “No one in editorial was informed that Nick had reached what he now calls the point of last resort; no one had explained what other resorts had been tried and had failed in the less than 24 hours between publication and takedown.”

In a separate email to the managing partnership, Read called the deletion “an absolute surrender of Gawker’s claim to ‘radical transparency.’”

“That non-editorial business executives were given a vote in the decision to remove it is an unacceptable and unprecedented breach of the editorial firewall,” Read said. “And [it] turns Gawker’s claim to be the world’s largest independent media company into, essentially, a joke.”

Denton wrote in his own memo that the article represented “an unprecedented misuse of the independence given to editorial.”

“The choice was a cruel one,” Denton wrote. “A management override that would likely cause a beloved editorial leader to resign on principle; or a story that was pure poison to our reputation just as we go into the Hogan trial.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh