Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Netflix Is Losing More Hollywood Movies, and Says You’ll Be Okay With That

A five-year deal with Epix is expiring, which means no more “Hunger Games” or “Transformers.”

Screenshot via Epix
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

Netflix says it’s not renewing a distribution deal with cable network Epix, which means its U.S. subscribers will lose access to big Hollywood movies like “Hunger Games: Catching Fire,” “World War Z” and “Transformers: Age of Extinction” at the end of September. The trade-off, says Netflix: It is making its own movies — but subscribers will have to wait a while to see most of them.

Epix is a joint venture of MGM, Lions Gate Entertainment and Viacom’s Paramount. Netflix signed on with the pay TV network five years ago, but it hasn’t had exclusive streaming rights for those studios’ films since 2012, when Amazon signed its own Epix deal.

Industry sources say Epix is likely to replace Netflix with a distribution deal with Hulu, the Web video service co-owned by Fox, Disney and Comcast’s NBCUniversal. (Update: That deal is official now and effective Oct. 1, per a press release: “At launch, blockbuster films such as ‘Hunger Games: Catching Fire,’ ‘Transformers: Age of Extinction,’ ‘Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles,’ ‘Star Trek: Into Darkness,’ ‘World War Z,’ ‘Wolf of Wall Street,’ ‘Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit,’ ‘Robocop,’ ‘God’s Not Dead’ and more will become available to Hulu subscribers for the first time.”)

“We’ve enjoyed a five-year partnership with Epix, but our strategic paths are no longer aligned,” Netflix content boss Ted Sarandos said in a statement. “Our focus has shifted to provide great movies and TV series for our members that are exclusive to Netflix. Epix’s focus is to make sure that their movies will be widely available for consumers through a variety of platforms.” There’s more from Sarandos in a blog post.

In the last few years, Netflix has been emphasizing stuff that you can get only on its service. It has laid out big bucks for an exclusive deal with Disney, which kicks in next year and will include its new “Star Wars” movies, as well as titles from Pixar and Marvel. And it has been spending an increasing amount of money on original TV shows like “House of Cards.”

Netflix has also started to get its feet wet with its own movies. Some of those will appear in theaters at the same time they debut on the streaming service, and others will go directly to Netflix.

But the home-grown movies Netflix has announced so far are no “Transformers” or “Hunger Games.” They include “Beasts of No Nation,” an “unflinching war drama”; four new movies from Adam Sandler; and a new mockumentary from Christopher Guest, the director behind “A Mighty Wind” and “Waiting for Guffman.” All may appeal to different niches, but are unlikely to be big crowd-pleasers.

Still, this would have been a much bigger deal for Netflix to lose a few years ago — like it was in 2011, when it lost its deal with the Starz pay TV network. But back then it didn’t have a track record when it came to original content. Now, it is cranking out stuff on a regular basis.

The bigger issue for Netflix will be if Hollywood studios and the networks that work with them start to cut off access to TV reruns, which remain crucial for the service.

Many people in the TV/movie/video world believe that one of the reasons TV ratings have nose-dived in the last year is that viewers are watching old TV shows on Netflix instead of watching new ones on TV. Some people want the studios and networks to stop selling their old shows to Netflix.

That appears unlikely to happen — at least all at once. But you can see signs of that strategy around the edges. Earlier this year, for instance, Fox announced it was selling reruns of its hit show “Empire” to Hulu.

Netflix would have certainly been interested in buying that show for its own viewers, but people familiar with the situation say Fox never even let them bid on that.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh