Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Facebook Starts Livestreaming, Too -- But Just for Celebrities

Heads up, Periscope and Meerkat.

Facebook
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

It was always a question of when, not if. So here’s the answer: Facebook, following in the footsteps of Meerkat and Twitter’s Periscope, is today rolling out its own version of a livestreaming app.

The big difference: Unlike Meerkat and Periscope, you can’t use this one to broadcast your own live video, unless you’re a famous person.

For now, Facebook is limiting use of its livestream product to “influencers” who use its Mentions app, which it introduced last year to encourage celebrities to use Facebook. Product manager Vadim Lavrusik says “thousands” of famous people use Mentions, which now has a livestreaming capability baked in.

Beyond that, this is essentially the same as the other livestreaming products we’ve seen. Celebrities point their phone at themselves or something else, hit a button and can instantly stream live to their followers on Facebook. People watching the stream can comment live, and the people making the stream can see those comments in real time. Facebook will also archive the videos, so you can play them back if you missed them live.

While some people — including Meerkat employees and investors — had thought that Facebook might work with, or buy, Meerkat to get into livestreaming, this is a home-grown product.

It seems as though the only thing that’s going to distinguish one livestreaming service from another is whether one of them really takes off — so far both Meerkat and Periscope have yet to disclose any meaningful user numbers, and industry buzz is that their metrics have drooped considerably after launching last spring.

If people do want to watch other people talk live on the Internet, Facebook might be livestreaming’s best bet, given its 1.5 billion user base. On the other hand, Facebook isn’t really a place you go to experience things in real time, or even close to it. Facebook’s algorithm is supposed to prioritize things it thinks you will like — not things that are happening now or that happened recently.

So how is a Facebook user supposed to know that Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson is cooking up something live, right now?

Lavrusik says Facebook will send alerts to celebrities’ fans — or people who have recently interacted with a celebrity on Facebook by “Liking” or commenting on something they’ve done — when that celebrity has started a livestream.

And even if you haven’t liked a famous person’s post in the last month or so, there are decent odds you’ll see a livestream in your stream, since Lavrusik says Facebook will show live video to people who like video. And, by Facebook’s calculation, it turns out a lot of people like watching video, since video views are booming at Facebook.

You can argue that Facebook has created a self-fulfilling prophecy here, since it is showing people videos that play automatically, and says that if people watch those clips for at least three seconds, that counts as a view. But Facebook isn’t interested in engaging in that argument — it just wants to show you more videos. So you’re going to see more videos, taped and live.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh