Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The NCAA Doesn’t Approve of DraftKings or FanDuel, Still Takes Their Money

NCAA athletes will lose eligibility if they pay money to play fantasy sports.

Otto Greule Jr / Getty Images

Thanks to a boatload of prime-time advertising, most of the sports world is now familiar with daily fantasy sports companies like DraftKings and FanDuel. What’s still unknown — or at least up for debate — is whether or not these sites, which allow people to win real money playing fantasy contests online, offer a form of gambling or a game of skill.

The NCAA has weighed in on that debate and … gambling it is!

College athletes that put up money on sites like DraftKings and FanDuel will lose a year of eligibility, according to a tweet from Mississippi State Athletic Director Scott Stricklin on Tuesday. “Listening to [NCAA VP of Regulatory Affairs] Oliver Luck speak this morning in Dallas,” he tweeted. “He reminds that any athlete found to be gambling on college sports (includes daily fantasy such as Draft Kings) automatically loses a year of eligibility.”

https://twitter.com/stricklinMSU/status/646321879934889984

https://twitter.com/stricklinMSU/status/646322006569291776

An NCAA spokesperson confirmed the stance in a statement sent to Re/code: “NCAA members schools have defined sports wagering as putting something at risk — such as an entry fee — with the opportunity to win something in return, which includes fantasy league games. Because of this, student-athletes, coaches, administrators and national office staff may not participate in sports wagering, including fantasy league games with a paid entry fee.”

In other words: The NCAA considers daily fantasy sports like DraftKings and FanDuel to be gambling, and players found participating will be punished as a result. Top NCAA execs have also asked DraftKings and FanDuel to “discontinue fantasy games that include the names of college players,” according to ESPN, a move that would certainly cut into the businesses of both companies.

The irony in all this is that the NCAA actually benefits from fantasy sports, and not just because they help boost TV ratings. The Pac-12 Network takes money from FanDuel by airing their advertisements (though only for professional contests, not college ones). Ad money from that network is then split among the conference’s member schools. The NCAA also rakes in hundreds of millions of dollars in television deals from broadcasters like ESPN and Fox Sports that are partnering with DraftKings and show DraftKings commercials at almost every stoppage of play.

DraftKings and FanDuel aren’t the only forms of fantasy sports banned by the NCAA. Players aren’t allowed to enter paid pools (like a March Madness pool) or other, more traditional pay-to-play fantasy leagues that offer a prize payout. So this isn’t a FanDuel- and DraftKings-only issue, although those are the most hot-button companies of the moment.

The NCAA’s stance shouldn’t alter the daily fantasy business right away. But it’s still not a good sign for DraftKings and FanDuel, which have a lot to lose if regulatory bodies decide the NCAA is right.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh