Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Sprint Won’t Be Participating in Next Year’s Wireless Auction, Says It Has Plenty of Spectrum

Sprint isn’t exactly flush with cash, and it wants to work with its existing spectrum.

Asa Mathat for Re/code

Earlier this year, the government spent a lot of time convincing TV broadcasters to give up wireless spectrum to cell carriers, who forked over a lot of money for those airwaves. The wireless networks are expected to shell out even more money for more spectrum at the beginning of next year.

Sprint, the fourth-place carrier among the United States’ big four, says it won’t be participating in that auction. In a statement issued Saturday, CEO Marcelo Claure said that “Sprint’s focus and overarching imperative must be on improving its network and market position in the immediate term.”

The auction, which is run by the Federal Communications Commission, is widely viewed as one of the biggest opportunities in years for mobile carriers. However, Sprint, thanks to its 2012 Clearwire acquisition, already has a fair bit of excess spectrum. And the company isn’t exactly flush with cash, because it’s spending heavily to attract new customers; for example, Sprint is heavily marking down new the iPhone 6s by offering customers a $1-a-month leasing plan.

In the statement, Sprint said that it has already “started a major effort to increase coverage and capacity by densifying its network, and increasing the number of cell sites using its existing spectrum.”

“Sprint is already deploying new technologies, such as carrier aggregation, that unlock the potential of its strong 2.5 GHz position,” the statement added.

Does this mean Sprint is tempering its ambition? At the Code Conference in May, Claure said that consumers should expect to see Sprint with the No. 1 U.S. network within 18 to 24 months. So, no, probably not.

Update: T-Mobile CEO John Legere, who likes beating up on Sprint on Twitter (as does Claure on T-Mobile), thinks Sprint isn’t participating for a different set of reasons. Also, the Masa to whom Legere is referring is Masayoshi Son, CEO of Sprint proprietor SoftBank.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady