Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The presidential debates on Twitter are bigger than the NFL on Twitter

369,000 people tuned in on Sunday.

Candidates Hillary Clinton And Donald Trump Hold Second Presidential Debate At Washington University
Candidates Hillary Clinton And Donald Trump Hold Second Presidential Debate At Washington University
Saul Loeb-Pool / Getty

More people watched Twitter’s livestreams of the first two presidential debates than the NFL games Twitter has been streaming.

Neither set of numbers are huge by TV standards. But they do give some credence to Twitter’s argument that it can be a live-video delivery platform.

Twitter says an average of 369,000 people worldwide watched Sunday night’s debate between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, up from the 344,000 who watched their first debate last month.

Twitter’s peak audience for football has been the 327,000 who tuned in to a Thursday night Patriots-Texans game last month.

All of those numbers are much smaller than the TV audiences for those events. Sunday’s debate drew 66.5 million U.S. viewers, and the first debate attracted 84 million viewers. And the New England-Houston game drew 17.5 million people.

One caveat to Twitter’s livestream numbers is that in the last week the company has begun autoplaying livestreams of its big events for users who access Twitter via desktop browsers, and counting views of more than three seconds in its totals. That is: Some of the 369,000 people who were watching the debate at any given time on Sunday were watching it because Twitter started playing the event for them automatically.

That said, the majority of Twitter’s usage happens on mobile, so the autoplay numbers shouldn’t have a huge effect on the totals.

Twitter is also showing off its overall “reach” numbers for the event, which include anyone who saw either the debate or the pre- or post-event coverage, streamed via Bloomberg’s TV operations. More than 3.2 million people streamed some portion of Sunday’s event, up 30 percent from the first debate.

But if Twitter wants to play in media’s big leagues, it needs to use the smaller, “average minute” numbers, which are the ones TV advertisers look at.

Still, the debate numbers are a nice talking point for Twitter, since it can now argue that it has been able to gather eyeballs for big sports events and debates.

One other feather in their cap: Unlike the NFL games, broadcasts and streams of the debates were widely available, basically anywhere you wanted to watch them. The fact that some people chose to watch them on Twitter is a good thing for Jack Dorsey and company.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh