Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

AT&T’s web TV plan will have more than 100 channels, but CBS isn’t on board yet

Coming next month: More than 100 channels for 35 bucks. But a major broadcaster seems to be missing.

Mayor Bloomberg And AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson Announce WiFi Enabled City Parks
Mayor Bloomberg And AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson Announce WiFi Enabled City Parks
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson
Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

Add AT&T to the list of companies that want to sell you TV over the internet: AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson says his online-only DirecTV Now package will cost $35 a month and offer more than 100 channels when it launches next month.

DirecTV Now will join Dish’s Sling and Sony’s Vue, which have been on the market for a while and may have around 800,000 subscribers so far.

Next year, Hulu, the service owned by Disney, 21st Century Fox and Comcast, will launch its own live TV service. Google, among others, is working on one as well.

One selling point AT&T will have, for now, is that AT&T mobile subscribers who sign up for DirectTV Now will be able to watch on their devices without having the data usage count against their caps. The bulk of long-form video viewing happens on Wi-Fi networks, not mobile, but that’s still a differentiating feature.

The other big one appears to be price: AT&T looks like it’s coming in significantly below Sling and Vue — and, for that matter, DirecTV itself. The satellite service, which AT&T bought two years ago, is offering a basic starter pack for $50 a month, but that’s only a teaser rate that jumps up significantly after a year.

But there’s almost always a catch with this stuff.

The major one, for now, is that while AT&T has signed up many TV programmers, including Disney, Comcast/NBCU, Fox and Time Warner, it doesn’t yet have a deal with CBS.

Normally, this wouldn’t be that significant — these carriage negotiations often stretch on for a while, and then settle up just before a launch deadline.

But CBS’ absence to date is worth noting, since in the past CBS has been quite willing to sell its programming to online distributors, as long as they meet its price. And CBS has already signed on for Google/YouTube’s service ahead of everyone else.

It’s also worth noting that CBS is already selling its own programming directly to consumers for $6 a month, and has said it has a million subscribers for that service.

If you’re CBS boss Les Moonves, that track record may give you confidence to hold out for a substantial fee from Stephenson. Even if it means Stephenson has to raise his prices.

Both AT&T and CBS reps declined to comment.

Other notes:

  • As we noted above, Stephenson’s online version of DirecTV is undercutting the pricing on traditional DirecTV. Traditionally you don’t do that with an asset you bought for $49 billion a couple years ago. But Stephenson knows that DirecTV is a declining asset, and he figures he would rather cannibalize — and keep — his own customers than let them leach away to competitors.
  • AT&T’s plan to offer data-free usage to its own customers — so-called “zero rating” — is the kind of thing that drives net neutrality advocates bananas. Up until now, that hasn’t really mattered, since regulators have allowed it. But since AT&T wants regulators’ blessing to buy Time Warner, it sure seems like the kind of thing Washington might kibosh as a condition of the deal. AT&T can go ahead and market that feature for now, but if the deal gets done, it might disappear in a year or so.
  • Note that AT&T has already signed up Time Warner for DirecTV Now. This makes sense, because Time Warner wants to make sure channels like CNN and TNT are included in the same bundles as its competitors. But it does give additional ammo to critics of the AT&T-Time Warner deal: If AT&T is already able to get Time Warner into digital video products, what additional benefit does it get when it buys the whole company?

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

America, Actually
Inside the fight over America’s data centersInside the fight over America’s data centers
Podcast
America, Actually

“The ugliest thing I’ve ever seen”: How New Jersey residents feel about a data center in their backyard.

By Astead Herndon
Podcasts
Could you spot an AI-written book?Could you spot an AI-written book?
Podcast
Podcasts

An author set up an experiment to find out.

By Amina Al-Sadi and Noel King
Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander