Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Does Trump’s victory mean I need stronger encryption?

The Verge’s Russell Brandom explains on Too Embarrassed to Ask.

President-Elect Trump And Vice President-Elect Pence Meet With House Speaker Paul Ryan On Capitol Hill
President-Elect Trump And Vice President-Elect Pence Meet With House Speaker Paul Ryan On Capitol Hill
Zach Gibson / Getty Images

Donald Trump is the president-elect of the United States. What happens now?

For some critics of Trump’s proposals — which have included the forced registration of millions of Muslim-Americans and “punishment” for women who receive abortions — the answer is to preemptively find ways to protect their digital lives. As Recode’s April Glaser explained yesterday, the 70-year-old reality TV star doesn’t like encryption and favors surveillance and hacking.

On the latest episode of Too Embarrassed to Ask, The Verge’s Russell Brandom explained what different types of encryption mean and how concerned consumers might protect themselves.

“If you’re just texting someone regularly, that’s not encrypted,” Brandom said. “The phone company can see what the actual content of your text is. But generally, if it’s a Hangout, if it’s Gmail, whatever program you’re using, it’s probably encrypted so that people ‘in the tubes’ — your service provider and stuff — all they see are numbers.”

The strongest form of encryption, offered by a handful of apps such as Facebook’s WhatsApp, Apple’s iMessage and Signal, is “end-to-end encryption,” meaning there are only two parties who can possibly see the decrypted message.

“If my phone gets hacked, they can still see everything because they got to one of the ends,” Brandom said. “But it’s sort of the best you can do, if you’re making a chat program and you want to make the messages as secure as possible.”

Later in the show, Recode’s Kara Swisher and Ina Fried debriefed on some of the other tech-related fallout of the election with The Verge’s Lauren Goode. Topics on the table included whether technology and tech culture created echo chambers for Hillary Clinton supporters, and if social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook have a responsibility to police the factual accuracy of posts.

Have questions about encryption or the election that we didn’t get to in this episode? Or have another tech topic on your mind? You can tweet any questions, comments and complaints to @Recode with the hashtag #TooEmbarrassed. You can also email your questions to TooEmbarrassed@recode.net, in case Twitter isn’t your thing.

Be sure to follow @LaurenGoode, @KaraSwisher and @Recode to be alerted when we’re looking for questions about a specific topic.

You can listen to Too Embarrassed to Ask in the audio player above, or subscribe on iTunes, Google Play Music, TuneIn and Stitcher.

If you like this show, you should also check out our other podcasts:

  • Recode Decode, hosted by Kara Swisher is a weekly show featuring in-depth interviews with the movers and shakers in tech and media every Monday. You can subscribe on iTunes, Google Play Music, TuneIn and Stitcher.
  • Recode Media with Peter Kafka features no-nonsense conversations with the smartest and most interesting people in the media world, with new episodes every Thursday. Use these links to subscribe on iTunes, Google Play Music, TuneIn and Stitcher.
  • And finally, Recode Replay has all the audio from our live events such as the Code Conference, Code Media and the Code Commerce Series. Subscribe today on iTunes, Google Play Music, TuneIn and Stitcher.

If you like what we’re doing, please write a review on iTunes — and if you don’t, just tweet-strafe Kara and Lauren. Tune in next Friday for another episode of Too Embarrassed to Ask!

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady