Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Facebook says it miscalculated more metrics, but it’s telling advertisers not to worry

On the plus side: This has nothing to do with fake news.

Advertising Week New York 2016 - Day 1
Advertising Week New York 2016 - Day 1
Facebook advertising chief Carolyn Everson
John Lamparski / Getty Images for Advertising Week New York
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

Attention, digital publishers and advertisers: Facebook has checked its math again. It needs to make some corrections.

The social network says it has been miscalculating several of the metrics it uses to measure how content performs on its property. It says the new numbers may differ significantly from what publishers are used to seeing.

In one case, a metric that measures how many people can see a publisher’s content on its page may shrink by 55 percent.

Facebook’s do-over comes a couple months after the company made a similar report, when it announced it had been overestimating a video viewing metric.

That disclosure prompted a flurry of discussion over whether publishers and advertisers could trust the data they were getting from one of the two dominant players in digital media. This news should do the same.

In both cases, Facebook says none of the restated numbers should affect the results advertisers paid for. If you gave Facebook money to generate a certain number of clicks or impressions, Facebook still delivered what you paid for, says Facebook ad boss Carolyn Everson.

Everson says that after Facebook disclosed that its video viewing numbers were off, it went back and reviewed other metrics, which led to the changes it’s announcing today.

The biggest change is to metrics that measured how many people could see a publisher’s Facebook page over the course of a week and a month; Facebook says those numbers may shrink by an average of 33 percent and 55 percent, respectively.

But Facebook says it has been correctly measuring how many people could see a publisher’s page on a daily basis, how individual posts performed and what happens when publishers pay Facebook to reach more people.

At the same time, the company is announcing other changes meant to give advertisers more confidence, including giving third-party auditors like ComScore, Nielsen and Moat more access to Facebook’s data.

“We are committed to doing what we need to do to provide the industry with more clarity, and give the industry more confidence in our metrics,” Everson said. “We have an unwavering commitment to getting this right at any given moment, knowing that it is going to continue to evolve.”

Everson says Facebook’s erroneous metrics are the results of bugs in their calculations, not a flaw in Facebook’s methodology.

In one case, Facebook’s new math will increase the results publishers are used to seeing: Facebook says the metric that tracks how many people watched 100 percent of a video may grow by 35 percent.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

America, Actually
Inside the fight over America’s data centersInside the fight over America’s data centers
Podcast
America, Actually

“The ugliest thing I’ve ever seen”: How New Jersey residents feel about a data center in their backyard.

By Astead Herndon
Podcasts
Could you spot an AI-written book?Could you spot an AI-written book?
Podcast
Podcasts

An author set up an experiment to find out.

By Amina Al-Sadi and Noel King
Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander