Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Donald Trump’s “victory rally” is all about going after those who doubted him

Donald Trump Holds Weekend Meetings In Bedminster, NJ
Donald Trump Holds Weekend Meetings In Bedminster, NJ
Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images

In the first night of his “victory tour” rally, Donald Trump promised to build a border wall, defended appointing billionaires to his Cabinet, and said “anything is possible” in America now that he’s won the election.

But throughout the speech in Cincinnati, Trump often appeared far more interested in looking back at the presidential campaign than looking forward to his presidency. He repeatedly replayed the highs and lows of the campaign, relishing in bashing those who had doubted him.

Trump couldn’t resist bringing his speech back to the election, even when he was supposed to talk about his presidency. At one point, he began talking about his plan to reduce regulations in states like North Carolina — which then led him to talk about how some had doubted he could win the state, which then led him to a familiar rant about the press:

We are going to reduce the regulations. If a company wants to still leave the state of Ohio or Pennsylvania — or how about North Carolina? How well did we do in North Carolina? Remember when they said, “He cannot win North Carolina.”

And then it was, “Breaking news, Trump won Florida.” And then we waited. But then the people back there, the extremely dishonest press. Very dishonest people. How about, how about. I mean, how dishonest. How about, when a major anchor who hosted a debate started crying when she realized that we won? How about it? Don’t tell me this is untrue.

Again and again in the speech, Trump veered from a prepared remark about his coming presidency to reliving the glory of the election. A few of the other wild tangents he took:

  • Dumping on third party candidate Evan McMullin and mocking those who thought McMullin could win Utah. “Remember when they said Donald Trump is going to lose to some guy I had never heard of? Who is that guy?” Trump said. “But the people of Utah were amazing, and we drowned them.”
  • Reflecting on the calls he’d received from foreign leaders after the race. “They all tell me how this was amazing. How they sat in their magnificent rooms, the prime ministers, presidents, and how they sat watching in wonderment hearing how people came to vote,” Trump said. “Honestly, one of them told me, ‘I truly respect the United States again because of what happened.’” (He didn’t say which foreign leader.)
  • Replaying a TV segment comparing his campaign to Andrew Jackson’s presidential victory. “When was that? 1838?’” Trump said. (Jackson was elected in 1828.) “Then somebody said, ‘That was great, but nothing like what happened here.’”
  • Why he was thankful for police that came out to support him. “The number of votes I got was staggering. Staggering,” Trump said.
  • Three consecutive times in a row, Trump mockingly quoted pundits who said, “There is no path for Donald Trump.”
  • How big his victory in Ohio had been. “We won this state by almost 10 points, which they say is totally unheard of,” Trump said. (He won Ohio by 7 points.)

It all suggests what many critics have long suspected: that Trump’s attention was riveted by the glitz and glamor of the campaign trail, but that he has no interest in or capacity to doing the hard analytic work of the presidency.

Vox’s Matt Yglesias has argued that the best way for Democrats to defeat Trump is to focus on how his policies will hurt working-class people, rather than hitting the president-elect for his outlandish temperament and clownish behavior. And that may be true.

But that doesn’t mean that Trump’s carnival barker style isn’t immensely troubling.

See More:

More in Politics

Politics
The rise of the progressive billionaire candidateThe rise of the progressive billionaire candidate
Politics

Why some on the left are feeling warmly toward Tom Steyer and other very wealthy contenders.

By Andrew Prokop
Politics
Mifepristone survives another Supreme Court scare — for nowMifepristone survives another Supreme Court scare — for now
Politics

Only Thomas and Alito publicly dissented.

By Ian Millhiser
Podcasts
Why the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in TrumpWhy the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in Trump
Podcast
Podcasts

Trump helped overturn Roe. Anti-abortion advocates still aren’t happy.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
A year of Trump is backfiring on the religious rightA year of Trump is backfiring on the religious right
Politics

Americans don’t really want “Christian nationalism.”

By Christian Paz
Politics
The real reason Americans hate the economy so muchThe real reason Americans hate the economy so much
Politics

Did decades of low inflation make the public far more unforgiving when it finally did surge?

By Andrew Prokop
Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram