Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Leaked documents from startup Maple show the brutal economics of food delivery

On average, the restaurant-in-an-app lost money on each meal in 2015.

Maple.com
Jason Del Rey
Jason Del Rey has been a business journalist for 15 years and has covered Amazon, Walmart, and the e-commerce industry for the last decade. He was a senior correspondent at Vox.

It has been a challenging year for food-delivery startups. SpoonRocket went out of business. Munchery is struggling. DoorDash and Postmates secured new investments at a lower and flat valuation, respectively.

Maple, the restaurant-in-an-app backed by celebrity chef David Chang, is facing an uphill battle, too.

The New York City-based delivery startup appears to have lost money on average on every meal in 2015, resulting in an operating loss of $9 million for the year on $2.7 million in gross revenue, according to an investor presentation reviewed by Recode.

By March of 2016, Maple began squeaking out a tiny profit of 30 cents per meal — or a gross margin of 2 percent — driven in part by reduced food costs.

The “Now” column is referencing somewhere around March of 2016.
The “Now” column is referencing somewhere around March of 2016.

But Maple was still forecasting an operating loss of $16 million for 2016 on revenue of $40 million. Those plans were predicated on expanding its service to other boroughs and to other Northeastern U.S. locations. Currently, though, Maple appeared to still only be servicing Manhattan.

A spokesman declined to comment.

It’s not uncommon for venture-backed startups to operate in the red for years while pumping investor money into revenue growth. (Case in point: Uber.)

But the on-demand delivery sector has been a notorious cash burner in recent years, and Maple’s business does not appear to be an exception, especially with the added cost of preparing its own meals. Food costs equaled 63 percent of gross revenue in 2015, a very high number for a food business. Costs from food waste came in at 26 percent of gross revenue. The startup also spent 17.5 percent of its sales on marketing.

As of March of 2016, the startup was spending $5.57 per meal on labor and $1.01 on packaging, which consists of Maple-branded mini shopping bags and compostable food containers.

Maple sent this investor presentation to investors in the first half of 2016 as it was struggling to raise a new round of funding on terms it liked, according to a source. Another source cautioned that many of the projections in the document have since changed because they were predicated on Maple raising a bigger round of funding than it did.

That’s why it’s tough to know what to make of the 2017 projections in the document, where Maple projected a profit on a huge increase in annual revenue to $213 million. Or its model that predicts a 42 percent gross profit margin on each meal when a market is “mature.”

Maple eventually succeeded in the second half of this year in raising a round that was larger than its $22 million Series A investment round. But the investment came in at a lower valuation than its Series A — a “down round,” in startup parlance — which was $93 million pre-money, according to startup data firm PitchBook.

The startup was incubated by Thrive Capital, the New York City venture firm founded by Josh Kushner, brother of Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner. Maple is run on the business side by CEO Caleb Merkl and on the culinary side by Executive Chef Soa Davies, who spent six years at New York City’s fabled Le Bernardin.

The idea for Maple was that it would differentiate itself from traditional restaurants by operating as a delivery-only service and from other meal-delivery competitors by crafting high-quality meals itself. It also makes its delivery people employees instead of contractors, which involves providing health benefits — something that is not common in the delivery space.

“We’re leveraging technology and logistics to build the next multi-billion dollar food brand,” the investor presentation reads. “We’re able to operate and adapt in a way that legacy brick-and-mortar players can’t.”

Maple offers a limited but rotating selection of lunch and dinner options sold exclusively via its app. The meals range in price from around $11 to $17. Friday’s menu includes a vegetarian banh mi sandwich for $12.50 and a spicy chicken sandwich for $11.50.

Part of the startup’s original pitch to customers was that all taxes, fees and tips were included in the meal price — something that many competitors do not do. Maple, however, recently added a $1.95 delivery fee on each order, which suggests that its original model was not sustainable.

Update: On May 8, 2017, Maple announced it was shutting down, with some employees joining U.K.-based delivery firm Deliveroo.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh