Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

One chart that shows how unusual Justice Scalia’s Supreme Court vacancy could be

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) at a press conference.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) at a press conference.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) at a press conference.
Mark Wilson/Getty Images

If Republican senators refuse a Supreme Court nominee to replace Antonin Scalia until President Barack Obama — or even a Democrat in general — is out of the White House, America could be looking at a historic length in a Supreme Court vacancy.

This great chart, from Sean McMinn at Roll Call, tells the story:

According to Roll Call, the longest length of time before a Supreme Court vacancy was filled — since 1900 — was 363 days.

But the Senate might refuse to appoint someone for much longer. “The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court justice,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said in a statement. “Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.”

If the Senate appointed someone the day (January 20, 2017) the next president takes office, the vacancy in Scalia’s seat would last 341 days.

But the process of accepting a nominee can last a lot longer than one day — especially if, say, President Hillary Clinton or President Bernie Sanders nominates a justice while Republicans still control the Senate and present a fractious confirmation process. So this vacancy could make records.

Besides, there’s reason to believe this vacancy could last far past this election year. Republicans have spun their opposition to any potential nominee by arguing that Obama shouldn’t nominate someone in an election year — because the final decision should be left to voters. But really their concern is that Obama will appoint a justice who’s far more liberal than Scalia, who was consistently one of the more conservative justices on the bench.

But if Clinton or Sanders is the next president, the exact same concerns over a liberal justice apply. If Republicans don’t budge, that could lead to a truly years-long vacancy.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters