Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

What Went Wrong With FanDuel’s Football Season Advertising Blitz?

FanDuel CEO: We may have gone overboard.

FanDuel spent the better part of last fall spending its newly claimed investor money on television ads with any network that would take it — which, for the uninitiated, is every TV network out there.

The company, which offers cash prizes for daily fantasy sports competitions, was racing for market share against rival DraftKings and Yahoo, plus potential competitors like ESPN. So it spent money. Millions and millions and millions of dollars.

“Someone said earlier that TV advertising doesn’t work. It does work for us. Very well,” said FanDuel CEO Nigel Eccles, who spoke Thursday at Re/code‘s annual Code/Media conference at The Ritz-Carlton, Laguna Niguel in Dana Point, Calif. “In terms of talking to our audience, it was great.”

But FanDuel learned a few things, too. Like, for example, more does not always mean better.

“There’s nothing more interesting in life than your fantasy football team, but there’s nothing less interesting in life than your buddy’s fantasy football team,” Eccles said. “I think what we did was we reminded you about your buddy’s fantasy football team every fifteen seconds for several months.”

The salt in the wound is that the ads created a lot of attention for the industry from people it didn’t want to attract, like regulators. DraftKings was also spending like crazy, which didn’t help. So did the marketing campaign lead to all of the industry’s regulatory issues?

“Possibly, yeah,” said Eccles. “We put it on the radar.”

All of this means that, assuming FanDuel is still around come football season, the company will make a few changes to its marketing strategy. “We’re definitely going to market differently,” Eccles said. “We’re definitely going to spend differently, it probably won’t be as much.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh