Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Mark Zuckerberg Defends Apple: ‘We Believe in Encryption’

“We’re sympathetic with Apple on this one.”

David Ramos / Getty Images

Apple has another ally in its fight against the FBI: Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

The social network issued a statement of support late last week, but Zuckerberg, one of the world’s most prominent voices on tech policy and privacy, hadn’t said anything personally. Until Monday, that is, when he spoke at Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, Spain, and said that adding back-door access to encrypted devices and messages was not “effective,” nor was it the “right thing to do.”

“We’re sympathetic with Apple on this one. We believe in encryption,” he said. “I expect it’s not the right thing to try to block that from the mainstream products people want to use. And I think it’s not going to be the right regulatory or economic policy to put in place.”

Apple, of course, is in the midst of a legal battle with the FBI, which is demanding that the company create a back door that would allow the government to access private information on an iPhone that was used by killers in the San Bernardino, Calif., massacre late last year. Apple argues that providing that kind of access is a dangerous precedent when it comes to an individual’s digital privacy.

Zuckerberg walked a fine line on Monday, first arguing for encryption but then adding that Facebook also helps the government fight terrorism where it can.

“We feel like we have a pretty big responsibility,” he added. “We certainly do have very strong policies on this that if there’s any content that’s promoting terrorism or sympathizing with ISIS or anything like that, we’ll … get those people off the service. We don’t want people that are doing that stuff on Facebook.”

Zuckerberg should be sympathetic. His own messaging app, WhatsApp, is also end-to-end encrypted, which means Facebook also deals with these security issues. (Facebook doesn’t own the hardware used to send these messages, which is what’s troubling Apple at the moment.)

Encryption was just one part of Zuckerberg’s conversation, though. Here’s what else he had to say.

On Facebook’s strategic and aggressive dive into video: “We hope to not get it wrong twice before getting it right,” Zuckerberg said, a nod to his company’s late and somewhat painful plan to bring Facebook from desktop to mobile four years ago. “Most of the content ten years ago was text, and then photos, and now it’s quickly becoming videos. I just think that we’re going to be in a world a few years from now where the vast majority of the content that people consume online will be video.”

On artificial intelligence, which he described as an advanced form of “pattern recognition”: “One of the most amazing examples I heard recently was having an AI which can now detect skin cancer,” he said. “Pretty soon we’re going to have this tool, that any doctor in the world can deploy, which can basically take a picture of something they think might be a little tumor, and know with the quality and accuracy of the best doctors in the world today whether that’s cancer. This stuff is awesome, but it’s all just pattern recognition.”

On why he likes Facebook live video, the company’s Periscope-like livestreaming video product: “There’s this increasing pressure to do well [on social media],” he said. “In 2016, if you’re sharing a photo you want it to be a good photo. What is really powerful about messaging platforms … and live video now, too, is it gives people more intimate environments and more raw environments where you have a reason to just be yourself. It doesn’t need to feel like it’s super curated.”

On how much screen time he’ll (eventually) allow for his now-three-month-old daughter: “I actually have not yet worked out with [my wife] Priscilla what our policy is going to be on this. But Facebook has a pretty clear policy that you’re not supposed to use it until you’re 13. I wouldn’t be a very good role model if I broke that policy now, would I? For Oculus, which I think is a pretty different thing, that might be under 13, but not for quite a while would be my guess. We’re pretty pro-technology.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh