Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

See if You Can Decipher Bill Gates’s Take on Apple-FBI Standoff (Poll)

Whither Gates?

JP Yim | Getty Images

If you were worried that the government’s ongoing dispute with Apple — and, by extension, the entire tech industry — would become less dramatic, don’t fret.

The latest twist comes from Bill Gates, the Microsoft co-founder and tech icon. On Monday night, the Financial Times ran an interview with Gates that, at first blush, showed him backing the government position that Apple should hand over data from the iPhone involved in the San Bernardino terror attacks. (The article’s headline proclaimed that Gates “breaks ranks” with Apple.)

Gates went on Bloomberg TV this morning to dispute the FT story. “I was disappointed, because that doesn’t state my view on this,” he said. Gates then argued that there are legitimate cases, namely terrorism, where the government is entitled to information, given the “right safeguards.”

The FT is standing by its initial interpretation. And to prove it, the paper has posted the relevant portion of the interview.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsnJU8eRvyU

There’s some debate among the Re/code staff whether Gates has a legitimate beef with the FT — if his comments were more waffling than a strong stance, or if he’s just backpedaling. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, whom Gates advises, has only weighed in by re-tweeting a middling trade association endorsement of Apple’s position.

What do you think?

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh