Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Affirm CEO Max Levchin Wants Apple to Open the iPhone -- But Just This Once

That’s a mighty thin line you’re walking, Mr. Levchin!

Asa Mathat

That’s a mighty thin line you’re walking, Mr. Levchin!

Max Levchin, the Affirm CEO and Paypal founder, was interviewed by Charlie Rose Friday night and shared a somewhat surprising stance on Apple’s legal battle with the FBI. Levchin said he wants Apple to help government officials gather data from a locked iPhone that was used by terrorists responsible for a mass shooting in San Bernardino, Calif., back in December. This is the opposite viewpoint of many of Silicon Valley’s other prominent tech leaders, including Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Google CEO Sundar Pichai.

“I ultimately hope that this propels its way to the Supreme Court very quickly, and the Supreme Court actually tells Apple, ‘You are compelled to open this phone up,’ Levchin said during the interview. “I personally want to see this case in front of the FBI with every bit of evidence so that they have access to whatever information they need to make sure my kids are safe.”

Buuut … there’s a catch. Levchin wants Apple to help just this once, and has a plan for how to avoid setting a precedent for companies breaking through their own security measures at every government request. It hinges on the recent death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and the unusual political situation his absence causes.

“We have a four against four court, which means it doesn’t set precedent,” he explained. “The court can compel Apple to open this one phone, and then it still goes in front of Congress. And we still have the public debate, and we still fundamentally decide what society would want to be.”

Well. That’s one scenario. Here’s a look at the interview snippet from Charlie Rose.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WweeBQQZxo&feature=youtu.be

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh