Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

A Google self-driving car has finally caused an accident

Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Until this month, Google could boast that its self-driving cars had logged more than a million miles without causing a single accident. Google’s cars had been involved in a few accidents, but all of them had been the fault of the other driver — often a car rear-ending the Google car.

But on Valentine’s Day, Google suffered the first accident where one of its self-driving cars was at least partially to blame.

Here’s what happened, according to Google’s official report to California regulators. The Google car was driving in the rightmost lane as it approached an intersection, but it encountered a sandbag blocking its path and had to stop. The car tried to merge into the slow-moving traffic on its left to get around the sandbag. It tried to merge in front of a bus, expecting the bus to slow and let it in. But the bus kept moving, and the Google car hit the side of the bus, damaging “the left front fender, the left front wheel, and one of the driver’s side sensors.”

Obviously this isn’t great news for Google, which doubtless enjoyed being able to boast that its cars had never caused an accident. But as accidents go, this one seems pretty minor.

Google estimates that the bus was moving 15 miles per hour at the time of the crash, while the Google car was traveling 2 miles per hour. No one was injured.

And if Google’s description is accurate, it sounds like the kind of mistake humans often make: misjudging the likely reaction of another human driver.

On the other hand, the public isn’t likely to accept self-driving cars that are merely as good as their human competitors. To convince customers to let computers drive them around, Google is going to have to design cars that drive much better than a human being would — and we just don’t have enough data yet to be sure whether self-driving cars are safer overall. So the Mountain View company still has some work to do.

(Hat tip to Kevin Roose.)

Disclosure: My brother is an executive at Google.

See More:

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh