Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Twitter Says It Took Down 125,000 ISIS-Related Accounts Since Last Year

Twitter says it’s doing its part.

Samir Jana/Hindustan Times via Getty Images

Twitter says it is doing its part to combat terrorism online. The company announced today that it has “suspended over 125,000 accounts for threatening or promoting terrorist acts primarily related to ISIS” since the middle of last year.

That’s a lot of accounts, and it’s possible some of them were created by the same people who get booted then come right back to create another one. This is one of the challenges for Twitter, which offers its users anonymity (unlike, say, Facebook).

A study released in the fall by George Washington University found that Twitter was indeed the platform of choice for ISIS propagandists in part because creating accounts is so simple.

Twitter does not actively look for terrorist accounts, but instead relies on users to report them. When this happens, though, the company will look at “similar” accounts to see if they violate the company’s terms of service, which prohibit things like violent threats.

Twitter says it has also “increased the size of the teams that review reports, reducing [its] response time significantly” on reported accounts.

This is all good news for government officials, who have been vocal in requesting that social networks like Facebook and Twitter take a more active role in weeding out the bad guys. Both companies claim to do everything in their power to remove these accounts and this material, but they don’t go actively hunting it.

This makes it a challenging job, Twitter wrote in its blog.

“As many experts and other companies have noted, there is no ‘magic algorithm’ for identifying terrorist content on the Internet,” the post reads, “so global online platforms are forced to make challenging judgement calls based on very limited information and guidance.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady