Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

5 people have been killed in a mass shooting near Pittsburgh

gun
gun
Libby Nelson
Libby Nelson was Vox’s editorial director, politics and policy, leading coverage of how government action and inaction shape American life. Libby has more than a decade of policy journalism experience, including at Inside Higher Ed and Politico. She joined Vox in 2014.

Five people were killed and three injured in a shooting at a backyard barbecue and house party in Wilkinsburg, a Pittsburgh suburb, late Wednesday night, according to local police.

Local police said there were at least two shooters, and police are still searching for them, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported. Neighbors reported dozens of gunshots — one man said 26; another woman said the shooting continued for at least a minute.

Police haven’t said what the motive for the shooting was, nor have they identified suspects. Wilkinsburg is a relatively high-crime area. It had the second-highest murder rate in Allegheny County in 2012.

This isn’t the first mass shooting in Wilkinsburg, a town with only about 16,000 people. In 2000, a man named Ronald Taylor went on a shooting spree at the Burger King and McDonald’s in town, killing two people and injuring three. The murders drew national attention, and Taylor is now on Pennsylvania’s death row.

By some definitions, this is the 44th mass shooting this year

Since Wednesday’s mass shooting in Wilkinsburg was at a house party rather than in a public place, it seems likely that people will debate whether it really counts as a “mass shooting,” even though eight people were shot and two survivors remain in critical condition.

Counting any shooting where at least four people were shot in roughly the same place at the same time, the definition used by the Mass Shooting Tracker, the Wilkinsburg shooting is the 44th mass shooting in 2016.

But there’s a debate about whether a “mass shooting” occurs anytime a large number of people are shot, or whether it only applies to a more specific subset of crimes that particularly terrify the public: shootings perpetrated by a lone gunman in a public place, often seemingly at random.

The distinction matters, because while shootings that kill at least four people aren’t rising, mass shootings in a public place — like the massacres in Charleston, San Bernardino, and Aurora, Colorado — appear to be increasing. And the debate over what counts as a mass shooting is also a proxy war for the debate about gun control, as Vox’s Dylan Matthews wrote: Supporters of gun control want to define the problem as broadly as possible, while opponents argue that certain types of shootings don’t count.

But one thing isn’t up for debate: America has a much higher gun homicide rate than other countries (that doesn’t even take into account that two-thirds of gun deaths in the United States are suicides) — and a higher homicide rate in general, driven mostly by those gun deaths.

Experts say this is due to America’s gun culture: We have more guns, more accessible guns, and more gun deaths — both suicides and murders, including domestic violence and violence against police.

Policy
Is Trump’s Justice Department trying to discredit itself?Is Trump’s Justice Department trying to discredit itself?
Policy

The DOJ used to avoid spectacles like the Louise Lucas raid.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
What the Supreme Court still has left to decide this termWhat the Supreme Court still has left to decide this term
Politics

Democracy and Donald Trump dominate the Court’s remaining docket.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court seems a bit nervous about letting the police track you with your phoneThe Supreme Court seems a bit nervous about letting the police track you with your phone
Politics

The justices were concerned that the Trump administration is asking for too much in a major police surveillance case.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Policy
Pam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerousPam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerous
Policy

The best thing about Bondi was her incompetence.

By Ian Millhiser
Culture
Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?
Culture

How the Epstein story became an American parable.

By Constance Grady