Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Poll: women have harsher attitudes toward prostitution than men

Chung Sung-Jun/Getty Images

Women judge prostitution more harshly than men and are more likely to think it should be illegal, according to a new YouGov poll.

The poll asked Americans about their attitudes toward sex work, including whether they have ever personally bought or sold sex. (If they’re answering honestly, apparently 6 percent of both men and women have sold sex, while 12 percent of men and 1 percent of women have bought it.)

A slight majority of men (51 percent) think working as a prostitute should be legal, while almost as many women (50 percent) think it should be illegal. The numbers were similar on paying for sex (50 percent of men think it should be legal and 52 percent of women think it should be illegal).

The poll also found that more women than men think working as a prostitute is morally wrong (65 percent versus 47 percent).

Put together, slightly more Americans think prostitution should be illegal (43 percent) than legal (40 percent).

More Republicans (52 percent) than Democrats (45 percent) or independents (37 percent) think it should be illegal to accept money for sex. There wasn’t a huge difference across age divides, though people under 30 were actually more likely than older generations to think buying or selling sex should be illegal.

What should we think about these results?

It’s easy to look at this poll and laugh about how of course most men want to legalize sex work.

But it might be more interesting to think about why women think it should be illegal. Is it Mean Girls–style judgment of promiscuous women? Is it a desire to protect other women from exploitation?

It’s hard to say what exactly lies behind this gender gap. It’s indisputable, however, that sex work is the subject of bitter divides in the feminist community. Some think sex work is exploitation no matter what, even for the women (or men) who choose that work. Others think this view is both patronizing and dangerous to people who willingly engage in sex work.

Moral quandaries aside, though, the evidence shows that banning sex work is counterproductive. When sex work is illegal and has to operate in the shadows, sex workers are at greater risk for exploitation and abuse. After examining the research on decriminalizing prostitution, Vox’s German Lopez concluded that sex work should be decriminalized and regulated like other businesses.

Decriminalization has major public health benefits like reduced rates of rape and sexually transmitted infections. Meanwhile the evidence in favor of prohibition — like the argument that legalized prostitution increases sex trafficking — is badly flawed. In fact, legalizing prostitution might even decrease demand for illegal sex trafficking.

Interestingly, most Americans don’t agree with harsh punishment for sex work or solicitation. Only 20 percent think that either buying or selling sex should be punished with prison. The rest think community service or a small fine would suffice, or aren’t sure.

But that’s a far cry from how sex work is punished in the real world, both legally and in less official ways.

In most states, sex work can be punished with at least some jail time and fines of up to $1,000 or more. The penalties are harsher for pimps and brothel owners. Georgia is trying to make prostitution solicitation a felony.

But social and legal stigma can inflict the most horrifying punishments of all. Sex workers face constant police harassment, risk losing custody of their children, and are murdered at alarming rates. Society thinks sex workers’ lives are worth less, and acts accordingly.

Policy
Is Trump’s Justice Department trying to discredit itself?Is Trump’s Justice Department trying to discredit itself?
Policy

The DOJ used to avoid spectacles like the Louise Lucas raid.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
What the Supreme Court still has left to decide this termWhat the Supreme Court still has left to decide this term
Politics

Democracy and Donald Trump dominate the Court’s remaining docket.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court seems a bit nervous about letting the police track you with your phoneThe Supreme Court seems a bit nervous about letting the police track you with your phone
Politics

The justices were concerned that the Trump administration is asking for too much in a major police surveillance case.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Policy
Pam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerousPam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerous
Policy

The best thing about Bondi was her incompetence.

By Ian Millhiser
Culture
Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?
Culture

How the Epstein story became an American parable.

By Constance Grady