Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Supreme Court to Hear Samsung-Apple Patent Dispute (Updated)

The amount awarded is “draconian,” says the South Korean conglomerate.

Ina Fried

The U.S. Supreme Court decided Monday to hear Samsung’s appeal of a $400 million judgment that Apple won in its long-running patent dispute, agreeing to consider Samsung’s argument that the penalties were excessive.

Samsung Electronics has already paid Apple $548 million as the result of the 2012 jury verdict. The South Korean conglomerate is looking to reduce the $400 million it paid for infringing on the look of the iPhone — the so-called design patent covering the smartphone’s rectangular shape and rounded corners.

Samsung argued that the design patent rule that forces companies to cough up their entire profits from infringing products is, per one Stanford Law School professor, “draconian.” In the parlance of the court filings, it’s arguing that Apple was able to collect “unjustified windfalls” — 100 percent of the profits — for cosmetics that couldn’t account for the total appeal of the infringing Samsung phones.

Google and Facebook joined Samsung in asking the high court to weigh in on the matter.

Apple already suffered a major blow in 2014 when it failed to convince a court to permanently ban the sale of Samsung phones that infringed on its patents.

Update: Samsung issued a statement, welcoming the Supreme Court’s decision to hear the case. “The court’s review of this case can lead to a fair interpretation of patent law that will support creativity and reward innovation.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh