Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The DOJ dropped its case with Apple over the San Bernardino shooter’s iPhone. Here’s why.

Apple CEO Tim Cook has been outspoken about his commitment to Apple users’ security throughout this fight with the DOJ.
Apple CEO Tim Cook has been outspoken about his commitment to Apple users’ security throughout this fight with the DOJ.
Apple CEO Tim Cook has been outspoken about his commitment to Apple users’ security throughout this fight with the DOJ.
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

The federal government didn’t need Apple’s help after all, formally dropping its bid to legally force the tech giant to unlock information on the iPhone of one of the suspects in the San Bernardino, California, attacks.

“The government has now successfully accessed the data stored on [Syed] Farook’s iPhone and therefore no longer requires the assistance from Apple Inc. mandated by Court’s Order Compelling Apple Inc. to Assist Agents in Search dated February 16, 2016,” the Department of Justice said in a court filing Monday.

The DOJ didn’t say how it obtained the information, which it previously said it had no way of accessing without Apple’s help. But the department hasn’t conceded the central issue that companies should release users’ private, encrypted data when necessary: According to reporting from Politico, the DOJ has not ruled out future lawsuits in other cases where tech companies refuse to help unlock encrypted information.

Apple framed this as a victory, maintaining that the issue should never have reached the court:

From the beginning, we objected to the FBI’s demand that Apple build a backdoor into the iPhone because we believed it was wrong and would set a dangerous precedent. As a result of the government’s dismissal, neither of these occurred. This case should never have been brought.

We will continue to help law enforcement with their investigations, as we have done all along, and we will continue to increase the security of our products as the threats and attacks on our data become more frequent and more sophisticated.

Apple believes deeply that people in the United States and around the world deserve data protection, security and privacy. Sacrificing one for the other only puts people and countries at greater risk.

This case raised issues which deserve a national conversation about our civil liberties, and our collective security and privacy. Apple remains committed to participating in that discussion.

DOJ spokesperson Melanie Newman confirmed that the information from Farook’s iPhone is with the FBI, but did not indicated whether it has proved useful in the investigation, Politico reported.

Go deeper:

See More:

More in Technology

Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Politics
Data centers could actually be good for your hometownData centers could actually be good for your hometown
Politics

The case for the buildings America loves to hate.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
How to fall in love with humanity againHow to fall in love with humanity again
Future Perfect

Tech culture has made contempt for humanity feel enlightened. We can do better.

By Sigal Samuel
America, Actually
Inside the fight over America’s data centersInside the fight over America’s data centers
Podcast
America, Actually

“The ugliest thing I’ve ever seen”: How New Jersey residents feel about a data center in their backyard.

By Astead Herndon
Podcasts
Could you spot an AI-written book?Could you spot an AI-written book?
Podcast
Podcasts

An author set up an experiment to find out.

By Amina Al-Sadi and Noel King
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram