Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Apple to Pay $450 Million E-Book Settlement After Supreme Court Waves Off Case

The U.S. Supreme Court declines to hear Apple’s appeal of the lower court’s ruling.

Asa Mathat

The Supreme Court declined Monday to review an appeals court decision that Apple conspired with book publishers to hike the price of e-books, a decision that means Apple must pay a $450 million settlement.

The high court offered no explanation for refusing to hear Apple’s appeal.

That means Apple must abide by the terms of a 2014 settlement to pay $400 million to as many as 23 million e-book consumers who were harmed by Apple’s price-fixing conspiracy with five big book publishers. The company will pay another $50 million to the states and in legal fees.

Apple had argued that the introduction of the iBooks bookstore — which was announced with the 2010 debut of the iPad — resulted in more competition in the market for digital books and benefitted authors, publishers and consumers.

“Following Apple’s entry, output increased, overall prices decreased and a major new retailer began to compete in the market formerly dominated by a single firm,” Apple argued in its petition for Supreme Court review.

The appeals court had rejected that argument, saying the arrangement between Apple and the book publishers served to eliminate price competition by allowing publishers to set e-book prices.

Apple co-founder Steve Jobs’s own words were used against the company. On one occasion, he had told James Murdoch, then head of a News Corp division that included one of the world’s largest book publishers, HarperCollins, that Amazon’s $9.99 sales were “eroding the value perception” of its products and that Apple would be trying higher price points.

Apple could not immediately be reached for comment.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh