Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Michael Bloomberg Will Not Run for President in 2016

The former New York mayor says he could win a few states, but not enough to win the office.

Getty Images

Mike Bloomberg, the three-term mayor of New York City and financial data and media billionaire, will not be a candidate for president in the 2016 election.

Bloomberg, who has been the subject of repeated speculation about a run as a third-party candidate who might derail the campaign of Republican front-runner Donald Trump, announced his decision not to seek America’s highest elective office in an editorial on the Bloomberg View website.

“I’ve always been drawn to impossible challenges, and none today is greater or more important than ending the partisan war in Washington and making government work for the American people — not lobbyists and campaign donors,” Bloomberg wrote. “But when I look at the data, it’s clear to me that if I entered the race, I could not win.”

Bloomberg had briefly fired up the hopes and dreams of the tech cognoscenti, who hoped his data-driven technocratic approach would resonate with enough voters nationally to at minimum avert a Trump presidency.

True to his core, for Bloomberg it all came down to simple numbers — specifically, the number of electoral votes needed to win the election outright: “I believe I could win a number of diverse states — but not enough to win the 270 Electoral College votes necessary to win the presidency.”

Instead, he said, he might win enough electoral votes to deny an electoral majority to anyone, and thus throw the race to the U.S. House of Representatives, which under the Constitution decides the election when there’s no clear electoral majority. The prospect of an election not decided by the people, he argued, was too risky: “Party loyalists in Congress — not the American people or the Electoral College — would determine the next president.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh