Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Former Editor’s Sarcastic Reply Takes Center Stage at Gawker-Hulk Hogan Trial

A.J. Daulerio’s comment was “flip” but may hurt the case.

YouTube

Hulk Hogan’s lawsuit against Gawker Media for publishing a sex tape of the retired wrestler in 2012, whose trial is currently taking place in Florida, continues to produce headline-making material.

For example, in a videotaped deposition shown in court Wednesday, ex-Gawker.com editor A.J. Daulerio was asked by attorneys for Hulk Hogan what he felt was the cutoff age for newsworthiness for a celebrity sex tape.

Daulerio’s sarcastic reply: “Four.”

The sharp exchange, recorded last April, stood out on a day filled with generally drier testimony from a Hulk Hogan lawyer, a journalism expert and the screening of a 2013 deposition tape featuring Gawker boss Nick Denton.

Hogan lawyer David Houston took the stand to give more detail on the cease-and-desist letter that he sent to Gawker after Daulerio released the video, and University of Florida journalism professor Mike Foley questioned some of Gawker’s decision-making in the course of publishing the sex tape.

Denton’s deposition touched on his thoughts on free speech and Gawker Media’s journalistic ethics. Both Daulerio and Denton are expected to take the stand when called by the defense in coming days.

The Daulerio exchange stood out, however, prompting Gawker Media to issue a direct response explaining that the ex-editor’s reply was sarcastic and not what he actually thought.

A copy of the statement provided to Re/code says that “[Daulerio] just said in the prior answer [of the deposition tape] that he wouldn’t post a tape of a child and when the question was repeated he obviously made the point in a flip way because his answer was already clear.”

Daulerio left Gawker in 2013 and later founded the online tabloid Ratter, which was backed in part by Gawker Media and Mark Cuban. In January, Daulerio said he was suspending Ratter’s publication until after the Hogan trial was finished.

https://twitter.com/TomKludt/status/707586055516635136

https://twitter.com/annamphillips/status/707589861839081472

https://twitter.com/davidbix/status/707327637983764481

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh