Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Bernie Sanders is using a back-waxing video to promote his campaign

Politics -- and programmatic ad buying -- make strange bedfellows.

Twitter

Over the last few days, a few different people on Twitter (a Re/code reporter included) spotted what looked at first glance like a BuzzFeed Twitter video promoted by the Bernie Sanders presidential campaign.

https://twitter.com/nkulw/status/721844243308941313

For someone casually scrolling down her Twitter feed, it might seem as though the Vermont socialist was paying to sponsor BuzzFeed videos. If you actually clicked on the video (which has since been deleted), a pre-roll Sanders ad showed up, which alleviated some of the confusion.

But that fundamental weirdness still remains, highlighting what has been a particularly thorny issue for all candidates running in the 2016 election. Programmatic ad buying — that is, using software to automate the buying process — can place political ads next to content on YouTube, Twitter and elsewhere that the candidates obviously don’t endorse.

Increasingly, campaigns rely on digital platforms and programmatic ad buying to influence voters. Analysts — Nomura’s Anthony DiClemente included — estimate political spending in the 2016 election cycle will reach $1 billion, roughly five times the amount invested in 2012.

The biggest beneficiaries of the surge in digital ad spending are Facebook and Google parent Alphabet, which boast the biggest online audiences and sophisticated tools for reaching potential voters.

When reached for comment on the Twitter-BuzzFeed promotions, the Sanders campaign made it clear that it didn’t choose which specific BuzzFeed videos — like, say, waxing — in which it was running ads. Digital director Kenneth Pennington said the campaign was advertising against all BuzzFeed videos.

The campaign, in turn, promoted the BuzzFeed video on Twitter, using targeting software known as Amplify that allows advertisers to reach an audience based on location, age, gender or interests. It’s this Amplify service that makes it look like the Sanders campaign was promoting the BuzzFeed video instead of the ad that it placed for users who actually opened up and watched the video.

The Sanders promotion also meant that the BuzzFeed videos appeared in front of audiences that would not normally see them: Likely voters in yesterday’s New York primary. Pennington did not immediately respond to questions about whom the campaign hoped to reach.

When reached for comment, BuzzFeed spokesperson Liz Wasden said, “We test with all kinds of products across many platforms, including this one with Twitter’s Amplify product.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh