Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

How San Francisco public transit is fighting back against manspreaders

California’s mass transit agencies are taking a stand against the “manspreaders” and seat hogs of the world.

San Francisco’s Bay Area Rapid Transit board voted to adopt a “one ticket, one seat” ordinance last week, which will fine people up to $500 for repeat seat hogging offenses. Los Angeles is expected to follow suit, according to Reuters.

Patrons on San Francisco’s BART will be given a warning for taking up too much room on the train. Then they’ll be fined $100 for the first violation, $200 if they’re caught again within a year, and $500 for each time they repeat the offense within five years. For the next six months, BART is running a public education campaign to tell people about the new rules.

In other words, this would not be allowed:

The board hopes the penalty will save space during BART’s busiest hours, when more than 50,000 people use the mass transit service daily. It will only be enforced between 6 am and 10 am, and 3 pm and 7 pm. The penalty is not meant to target people with luggage or the homeless, BART Director Joel Keller told the San Francisco Chronicle: “People pay a lot of money for a seat. In those rare cases where we have some knucklehead who refuses to give up a seat, at least an officer has authority to write a ticket.”

Manspreaders and seat hoggers have increasingly become frustrations for the growing population that relies on public transportation. New York’s subway has launched public service campaigns against the phenomenon in the past. During her time at Mic, Vox’s Liz Plank explored the world of manspreading on a busy New York subway to figure out how gender plays a role in the space-intrusive act:

See More:

More in Politics

Politics
Data centers could actually be good for your hometownData centers could actually be good for your hometown
Politics

The case for the buildings America loves to hate.

By Eric Levitz
America, Actually
Inside the fight over America’s data centersInside the fight over America’s data centers
Podcast
America, Actually

“The ugliest thing I’ve ever seen”: How New Jersey residents feel about a data center in their backyard.

By Astead Herndon
The Logoff
Trump’s brazen plan for a $1.7 billion slush fundTrump’s brazen plan for a $1.7 billion slush fund
The Logoff

Trump will reportedly drop his IRS lawsuit — for a price.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
The rise of the progressive billionaire candidateThe rise of the progressive billionaire candidate
Politics

Why some on the left are feeling warmly toward Tom Steyer and other very wealthy contenders.

By Andrew Prokop
Politics
Mifepristone survives another Supreme Court scare — for nowMifepristone survives another Supreme Court scare — for now
Politics

Only Thomas and Alito publicly dissented.

By Ian Millhiser
Podcasts
Why the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in TrumpWhy the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in Trump
Podcast
Podcasts

Trump helped overturn Roe. Anti-abortion advocates still aren’t happy.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram