Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Time Warner makes livestreaming bet, invests in Kamcord

The funding values the company at more than $100 million.

Snowman Games

Facebook and Twitter aren’t the only two companies interested in livestreaming.

Kamcord, a livestreaming app that lets users broadcast the contents of their phone screen, has raised $10 million in a new funding round led by Time Warner. The funding values the company at more than $100 million, according to co-founder Aditya Rathnam. Tencent, TransLink Capital, XG Ventures, Plug & Play Ventures and Wargaming also participated in the round.

Kamcord does things differently from Facebook Live or Twitter’s Periscope, which both let people broadcast from the camera on their smartphone. Kamcord, on the other hand, lets you broadcast what’s actually on your phone screen, which makes it popular for mobile gamers and those who like to watch people play mobile games. (Yes, people like watching other people play video games online — just ask Twitch.)

The gaming element is one of the reasons Time Warner was interested in Kamcord. Time Warner-owned Turner is launching a televised eSports league, and while no official partnerships have been set in stone, Kamcord would make an obvious companion, says Rachel Lam, the group managing director of the Time Warner Investments group.

As part of the deal, Lam is joining Kamcord’s board of directors.

There’s one other key difference between Rathnam’s product and its more popular competitors: Kamcord actually pays its broadcasters. People who watch a Kamcord stream can pay money to send the creator “virtual goods,” essentially a donation that is then split between the company and the broadcaster.

The hope is that paying creators — something Facebook does for a few high-profile broadcasters but Periscope has never done — will lure media personalities who currently post videos on YouTube, says Rathnam.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh