Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Google’s Waze says, ‘Nope, hackers can’t stalk you on our app’

A stranger cannot find you in the app, says the app.

Flickr / cc shevy_dk

Yesterday, research surfaced showing how Waze, the Google-owned driving assistance app, has a vulnerability that would let hackers track users’ whereabouts unbeknownst to them.

No way, Waze replied today. The Google unit released a statement addressing what it calls “severe misconceptions” about the study, released by researchers at University of California Santa Barbara, and an unnamed “news article.”

That article, I’ll venture, is from Fusion’s Kashmir Hill. She detailed how researchers, in essence, reverse engineered Waze’s servers to create several “ghost drivers” — fake versions of the little car icons you see on the app — that enable them to track other drivers in real time. She even applied the app’s bug hack to herself:

Last week, I tested the Waze vulnerability myself, to see how successfully the UC Santa Barbara team could track me over a three-day period. I told them I’d be in Las Vegas and San Francisco, and where I was staying — the kind of information a snoopy stalker might know about someone he or she wanted to track. Then, their ghost army tried to keep tabs on where I went.

In its response, Waze notes that faux car icons are the norm — a way to make users feel like they’re not so alone in places where Waze is new. And it insisted that “a stranger cannot” find or follow you while using the app.

Plus, there’s a hitch here, Waze countered: Hill wanted to be found. “The reporter in the article gave her location and username to the research team,” the post reads, “which greatly simplified the process of deducing sections of her route after the fact by using a system of ghost riders.”

But that, Hill said via email, is just the point: “I did give my location to the researchers, [and] it was a surprise to me that knowing where I live or where I work would be sufficient information for a hacker to then follow my movements using Waze.”

Still, the company said the research prompted a change in its privacy safeguards:

We appreciate the researchers bringing this to our attention and have implemented safeguards in the past 24 hours to address the vulnerability and prevent ghost riders from affecting system behavior and performing similar tracking activities. None of these activities have occurred in real-time and in real-world environments, without knowing participants.

Waze declined to comment on what those safeguards are exactly.

Waze’s parent, Google, has also faced criticism of its vulnerabilities, particularly around Android. In those cases, researchers found security holes, but never any incidences of actual hacks.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh