Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

GoPro unveiled its virtual reality camera for Google a year ago. It’s still not here.

Whither the GoPro Odyssey?

Justin Sullivan | Getty Images

Eleven months ago, at its marquee developers conference, Google announced its big, splashy foray into virtual reality video: Jump, a platform for shooting 360-degree footage. And it teased the first “Jump-ready” camera — one from GoPro. In the fall, GoPro unmasked that gigantic camera rig, called the Odyssey, promising its arrival in November.

The Odyssey didn’t come in November. And it still hasn’t arrived.

Since the announcement, the action-camera company has held several talks with people in the virtual reality industry interested in using the high-end camera equipment. But those talks abruptly stalled around January and GoPro’s team went dark, according to two sources.

That lag underscores the difficulty GoPro has had expanding beyond its core market of extreme sports enthusiasts. It also highlights the challenges Google faces in racing rivals, particularly Facebook, to forge and seize the nascent market of consumer VR.

Sources said that content producers had filed paperwork for early dibs on GoPro’s camera, but did not make any payments.

GoPro listed the Odyssey price at $15,000 — a hefty sum, yet one commensurate with its lofty promise. The device cobbles together 16 GoPro cameras in order to shoot spherical video. Coupled with Google’s computational tools, the companies claimed the camera would solve one of the persistent hurdles in VR content — shooting quality footage that captures depth and allows viewers to explore the frame without feeling nauseated.

A GoPro rep sent over the following statement: “Odyssey is a priority for both GoPro and Google, and we are continuing to work together. We have content partners lined up, we’ve shot content with the camera and will have more Odyssey news to share soon.” A Google rep seconded the statement. But both comments declined to explain the delay.

So it’s likely the camera may land in the coming weeks. Or it may come around Google’s next developer conference at the end of May, which will focus heavily on VR and may have updates on Jump, including possible new compatible cameras. Google hasn’t given up on its ambitions to flood YouTube with compelling VR video. In January, the company said over 350 thousand hours of such footage has been watched, and it will probably have new numbers in May.

Still, the wait may have put a dent in GoPro’s plans to move deeper into VR capture. While VR production is a niche market, it’s a growing one as tech and media companies scramble to generate as much content in the form as possible. Initial consumer devices, like Facebook’s Oculus Rift and HTC’s Vive, arrived this spring. Yet the content on those devices was likely shot on cameras from GoPro’s ostensible competitors, such as Nokia and the startup Jaunt.

Some industry sources attribute the Odyssey’s wait to its features. It’s hard to build such a camera! Google’s VR focus has been more on widespread use of the media — via its cheap Cardboard device and potential ways that smartphones or other devices can view and capture VR video — rather than very expensive camera hardware.

GoPro’s business struggles may also be a reason. Its stock has fallen sharply in the past year as growth in the action camera market has slowed, and the company’s media plans have yet to pay dividends. GoPro shares are currently trading at $12.10. When it announced its upcoming camera with Google last May, it was trading at $58.81.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh