Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

2016: The Year Election Ads Finally Come to the Internet

Welcome to the future, political advertisers. The Web has been waiting for you.

Andrew Renneisen/Getty Images
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

Here’s another first for the 2016 election season: It’s the first time political campaigns are going to spend real money on digital ads.

That might seem odd to you, because you’re reading this on the Internet, where you do lots of other things. So you might assume that politicians and their campaigns have been spending money to reach you here for years.

Not so: Up until now, political advertisers have treated the Internet as a novelty. In 2008, digital accounted for a paltry $22 million of the $6.2 billion campaigns spent on advertising.

And two years ago, long after everyone else had started pushing significant dollars to Web ads, politicos hung back, spending significantly more on things like radio and billboards.

Things are different this year, says Nomura analyst Anthony DiClemente, who predicts that campaigns will spend $1 billion on digital advertising.

That’s about 10 percent of the $10.1 billion he thinks they’ll spend overall, with TV getting the bulk of that money, just like it has for a long time. But digital is finally starting to eat into traditional media’s share:

And most of the spending that is moving to digital is going to end up with two companies, Nomura says: Alphabet and Facebook, which will get around $400 million and $350 million in political ads, respectively.

That makes sense, given those two companies’ dominance in digital advertising in every other sector.

Still, it has to smart a bit over at Twitter, which has seen a burst of political activity, led by Twitter savant/wizard Donald Trump. But when you’re as good at Twitter as Trump is, you don’t need to pay.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady