Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

It’s 2016, so Twitter will make it easier to cram photos and links into tweets

The 140-character limit stays, though.

Bill Pugliano / Getty Images
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

The Twitter biggification is coming.

Jack Dorsey and company are going to make it easier for users to stick more stuff in their tweets.

Not by dropping the service’s famous 140 character limit — an idea the company had previously floated — but by expanding it, in a way: Twitter won’t count the characters used to insert photos, links or other media into tweets against the 140 character limit.

Bloomberg says the change “could happen in the next two weeks,” citing a person who would know. I talked to one of those people, and they didn’t argue with the report.

Now imagine I wrote some boilerplate text about Twitter needing to make changes to its product to make it easier to use, so that its growth rate will stop flagging. Good? Okay.

But the fact that this story is a story, in 2016, tells you how reluctant Twitter has been, over the course of many years and many executives, to make even slight changes to its product.

There’s absolutely no reason for the company to keep the 140-character limit anymore — it’s an artifact of Twitter’s birth as an SMS service, in an era when smartphones were still rare. And even if Twitter does like the idea of the forced concision that the limit requires, it could have instituted this change a long time ago.

Now: Cue tweets from Twitter users who think the change will hurt the platform.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh