Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Google celebrated civil rights leader Yuri Kochiyama and some people think it’s promoting radicalism

I met her a few times. She wasn’t a radical.

Google Doodle celebrating Yuri Kochiyama
Google Doodle celebrating Yuri Kochiyama
Google Doodle celebrating Yuri Kochiyama
| Alyssa Winans

Because the internet is often a great place for amplifying amateur observations and because Wikipedia lacks context and because it’s one of the most divisive election seasons ever, today’s Google Doodle celebrating the life of civil rights activist Yuri Kochiyama turned into a thing.

Some internet people said Google was celebrating a radical. Indeed, Kochiyama’s Wikipedia entry cites her as “one of the few prominent non-black Black separatists....Influenced by Marxism, Maoism, and the thoughts of Malcolm X.”

Couple this with conservatives blasting Facebook for its left-leaning bias and you have what amounts to a typically tone-deaf move from a Silicon Valley giant, or larger evidence of a socialist conspiracy.

Anyone who had worked with Kochiyama knows these characterizations are wrong.

When I was in my early 20s and being a good Asian American, meaning I attended meetings at college, I met Kochiyama maybe a half dozen times. She did work with Malcolm X — he died in her arms — and well into her old age she continued to fight for people of color. She held closely to the causes Malcolm X fought for later in his life, a focus on human rights, not just black rights. She lived in a Japanese internment camp during WWII so she knew something about that.

Kochiyama was a voice for people who looked like me, which is still unusual, and that’s what makes Google’s choice notable, not that she was a radical, whatever that word means. If you want to know a bit more about her, this 2008 interview is helpful.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh