Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Three critical questions Google needs to answer after its big I/O conference

Distribution, distribution, distribution.

We learned quite a bit this week from Google’s three-day developer bonanza about what the internet behemoth sees as the future of tech, of mobile and of itself.

But there was much left unanswered. For one, we don’t know when most of the new products — set to propel Google in the emerging fields of artificial intelligence and virtual reality — will arrive.

We laid out the lingering questions for Google’s new, industry-altering AI chips earlier. Here are three others to chew on:

How will Google sell its hardware?

While software dominated the show, hardware had its moments. Specifically, Google previewed three coming devices: Home, its entry point for the AI-infused assistant; a VR headset it will make; and a new smartphone division that will build and ship its (much delayed) Project Ara modular phones.

Each is primarily intended as a vehicle for Google’s services, but the company certainly wants (and needs) to get them into consumer hands.

How does the Google Home get into your hand?

Google has never done that last part well. Chromecast, its best-selling hardware, has sold 25 million units, Google shared this week, but is handicapped by a removal from Amazon’s store. Those upcoming devices will sit with Chromecast in Google’s fresh hardware unit under former Motorola chief Rick Osterloh. (Those working on the VR headset report jointly to Osterloh and the VR division.)

It’s likely that Google will replicate its distribution strategy with Cardboard — give it away for cheap or for free.

Yet sources familiar with Google guessed that Osterloh’s hire indicated a potential revival of “Android Silver,” the company’s abandoned effort to aggressively ship high-end devices to compete with Apple head-on. That would come with an aggressive retail strategy, too.

What’s up with Google’s messaging strategy?

Inquiring minds want to know. Even minds at Google. (One employee expressed confusion with the company’s baffling strategy in a brilliant comic.)

With Allo and Duo, Google now has four separate messaging products. It’s a far cry from what most expected: A united front to combat Facebook.

Google said that Hangouts, its chat service, is not going away. But it didn’t say if Allo will replace it as one of the pre-installed Android apps. And it didn’t say how Allo squares with the native Android Messenger.

In fact, it didn’t say much. So I’ll take a stab: Messenger will stay distinct, as it’s set to launch richer texting services, like Apple’s iMessage, with the carriers, sources say. If Allo gets uptake, Google might quietly phase out Hangouts. More likely, it’ll convert Hangouts to a beefier enterprise product.

When or how remains to be seen. Also, we don’t yet know how Google plans to take the critical part of Allo — the services from its smart assistant therein — to other apps and platforms, which is Google’s ultimate goal.

Where does the money come from?

If tinier screens hobbled Google’s ad juggernaut, wait until the screens disappear.

Bloomberg handled this nicely, asking how the transition from mobile to voice search and augmented reality will dent Google’s business. That real dent is years away.

But you could interpret each new Google thing as a long-term hedge, an attempt to keep search — and the valuable transactions around it — from moving to Amazon, Facebook and a litany of other bots. Google’s new tools for Android developers (less sexy, but critical) were all designed to make it more compelling to spend money with Google. Same for VR, although the money-making method there is hazy for now.

At I/O, Google’s search and AI boss addressed the question tentatively. He hinted at a model for future products built around licensing the tech and tying it to cloud services.

It was vague. But I didn’t expect an immediate answer, partly because I think Google does not yet know it.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh