Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Snapchat’s startup professor says we’re overlooking one of its big advantages

Unlike tweets, Snapchat Stories don’t get lost in the social stream.

Yahoo Set To Invest $20 Million In Snapchat
Yahoo Set To Invest $20 Million In Snapchat
Photo by Peter Macdiarmid/Getty Images
Jason Del Rey
Jason Del Rey has been a business journalist for 15 years and has covered Amazon, Walmart, and the e-commerce industry for the last decade. He was a senior correspondent at Vox.

As far as venture capitalists go, Mark Suster publishes more of his views online than most. He blogs. He tweets. And, as of late, he snaps. A lot.

So when he says he’s learned some new things about distributing content online in 2016, it’s worth a read. In a new blog post, Suster points out the big challenge of reaching all of your followers on Twitter with the same article or video or message, given the way the timeline is organized.

Because Twitter was a reverse chronology network, once a Tweet had passed by your stream you were unlikely to see it. The “half life” was very short. As somebody who invested his time heavily in writing and wanting to share his thoughts through a blog I learned that I had to Tweet a post 3 times to get it read: 5am, 8am and 10pm.

Yes, Twitter has started showing some older, popular tweets in your stream that you may have missed. But the issue Suster notes still largely holds true.

The structure of Snapchat Stories, on the other hand, means you should be able to reach more of your followers with the photos or videos you are publishing.

[T]here is one big innovation that the market hasn’t talked about. Snapchat stories takes everything that I do in a 24 hour period and builds it into one cohesive story.

Think about that. On Twitter if I post at 7:35am and again at 8:15am, there will probably be 150 Tweets in your stream between those, meaning there is no cohesion in my successive Tweets and meaning that if you log in at 8:30am your chances of seeing my 7:35am Tweet is slim-to-none. That’s not necessarily good or bad — but it’s different.

On Snapchat when you click on my “story” you see every post of mine sequentially for my entire past 24 hours. This is a big deal. If you don’t want to “complete” my story you simply swipe left and you’re on to the next story.

Snapchat Stories aren’t really the place to share links to written stories. And building a following on Snapchat can be harder than on some other platforms.

But Suster has a point. If you’re in the business of distributing photos and videos — and aren’t a big media company that can get your own Snapchat “channel” — the 24-hour life of Snapchat Stories makes it an attractive place to set up shop.


Snapchat is one of the few exceptions

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh