Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Google denies it is secretly helping Hillary Clinton with its search results

A plot straight from “House of Cards.”

The Smithsonian And Netflix Host A Portrait Unveiling And Season 4 Premiere Of ‘House Of Cards’
The Smithsonian And Netflix Host A Portrait Unveiling And Season 4 Premiere Of ‘House Of Cards’
Paul Morigi / Getty

This is unusual.

When faced with allegations that Google is jiggering its search results, the company typically issues a curt statement or stays silent, waiting for the controversy to fizzle.

Instead, late on Friday, Google issued a blog post detailing how its autocomplete function works in search. It didn’t say so explicitly, but the post is a direct rebuttal to claims — surfaced by a site on Thursday — that the function buries more damning search results for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, thereby aiding her electoral odds.

Google denied it initially, but felt it necessary to add more after the claims drew considerable attention online and in political quarters. (Donald Trump was alarmed.)

Here’s Tamar Yehoshua, the Google VP who runs that search feature:

The autocomplete algorithm is designed to avoid completing a search for a person’s name with terms that are offensive or disparaging. We made this change a while ago following feedback that Autocomplete too often predicted offensive, hurtful or inappropriate queries about people.

The short post concludes with a note, addressed to us web searchers, “that your trust is what keeps you using Google.”

It’s doubtful that the incident will send people en masse to Bing. But Google is particularly concerned about these sorts of claims, in no small part because the contested (frankly bizarre) 2016 electoral politics have given the notion that Silicon Valley shows its political stripes through its products serious legs.

Fiction doesn’t help. The situation Google faces is nearly identical to a central plot line in the fourth season of Netflix’s “House of Cards.” (So I am told; I’ve only made it through the first season. No spoilers!)

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh