Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Apple drives apps into services

The key takeaway from this year’s WWDC was all about Siri, Messages, Maps and Music.

Gabrielle Lurie / WWDC

A version of this essay was originally published at Tech.pinions, a website dedicated to informed opinions, insight and perspective on the tech industry.


The keynote event at the annual Apple Worldwide Developer Conference is usually about apps. This year, however, things were a bit different.

Oh sure, Apple touted two million apps in the iOS app store — more than 6,000 available for tvOS — and highlighted the work of a few small developers, but the key takeaway from this year’s event was all about services: Siri, Messages, Maps and Music.

For those who closely watch Apple, this probably isn’t too surprising, as the company has been receiving pressure to focus more on services in light of its hardware declines, and it has been more vocal about its efforts to expand services.

What became very interesting to me as I watched the keynote and then thought about all the new capabilities the company introduced, however, is that, in many ways, Apple is subsuming the capabilities of standalone apps into its services.

In many ways, Apple is subsuming the capabilities of standalone apps into its services.

The most compelling demos at the event all involved integrating capabilities that used to require launching a separate app directly into an expanded Apple service. Want to call an Uber or a Lyft and see where it is? You can do so via Messages and Maps. Want to view rich website links, and even make purchase transactions or send money via Square or other online payment methods? All that can happen without leaving Messages, as well.

This decreased focus on individual apps and increased focus on services isn’t necessarily a bad thing. In fact, it’s arguably the general direction that software development — particularly on mobile devices — is going. In China, for example, you can get access to these kinds of services and much more in WeChat. These developments do, however, imply a fairly major shift in the role that developers can and will have with Apple and end users. They also imply a major rethink in terms of what an “app” actually is.

In essence, the new app model in this services-focused approach is a “service extension,” which strikes me as being much more similar to the “skills” you can add to an Amazon Echo than a traditional app.

The problem is that this model almost completely cuts out the importance, and end user awareness, that app developers have. Does anyone think of the “skills” they add to an Echo in the same way they do an app? Oh, yeah — and what about monetization for that service extension developer?

Given the overall app fatigue that many people face, as well as the flattening hardware sales, it’s getting tough enough for people to survive as app developers. Add in this additional layer of abstraction and the distance between developers, and end users will likely increase at about the same rate that dollars from them decrease — pretty fast.

Microsoft, Google, Amazon and Facebook all face different types of challenges as we move into a world where we are much less dependent on individual devices and specific OS platforms.

For Apple, the situation is a challenging one. On the one hand, it’s expected that the company will continue to drive forward the overall experience of using its devices. Apple needs to provide capabilities that its end users want, and it’s becoming increasingly clear that a more seamless, less app-focused approach is the way to go. On the other hand, by subsuming not only the functionality of individual apps, but the manner in which developers can extend the experience of using their devices, it has created a bigger business challenge for many developers.

To Apple’s credit, the company opened up Siri, Messages and Maps to outside developers for the first time with the announcements at this year’s WWDC. Given the company’s notoriously tight grip on core system elements, and its desire to control the entire Apple device experience, this is a significant development. But, given the overall market trends toward services, you could make the argument that Apple essentially had to in order to give its developers a fighting chance.

The ongoing shift from software to services is something that extends well beyond Apple, of course. Microsoft, Google, Amazon and Facebook all face different types of challenges as we move into a world where we are much less dependent on individual devices and specific OS platforms. But as the company that arguably made “apps” what they are, Apple and its developers will likely face some of the most challenging transitions.

Some of these services-focused changes may take several years to play out, but they’re clearly leading the tech industry down some new paths.


Bob O’Donnell is the founder and chief analyst of Technalysis Research LLC, a technology consulting and market research firm that provides strategic consulting and market research services to the technology industry and professional financial community. Reach him @bobodtech.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh