Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Even under Alphabet, Google executives keep the same old tight control over shares

New name, same old stock.

Fortune Global Forum
Fortune Global Forum
Kimberly White / Getty

On Wednesday, a select few holders of Google stock practiced their annual ritual of asking the company to end its stock structure that heavily favors top management.

And top management practiced its annual ritual of soundly rejecting that proposal.

Google’s annual meeting, where it invites stockholders to its headquarters, marks its first since reorganizing itself into the holding company Alphabet. But the agenda was virtually identical to prior years. It began with a vote approving Alphabet’s board, which is the same as Google’s.

Then came shareholder proposals. The first is a familiar one: A shareholder group asked Alphabet to scrap its dual-voting structure, proposed four years ago, that clumps most voting power in Class B shares, which are primarily owned by Google co-founders and Alphabet chiefs Larry Page and Sergey Brin.

“We are very concerned at the use of insider control at Alphabet,” a shareholder said introducing the proposal. Shareholders raised the same argument last year, when the company was called Google.

Subsequent proposals asked Alphabet to disclose more on its political spending and compensation structure by gender.

All were voted down. Page and Brin, who attended the meeting in person last year, voted via proxy.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh