Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Brock Turner’s sexual assault victim explains why she’s remaining anonymous

“I am every woman.”

The unnamed woman who was sexually assaulted by Stanford student Brock Turner plans to remain anonymous, in part, she says, to make an important statement.

Turner was sentenced to six months in county jail and three years’ probation, and will have to join the sex offender registry. Though his image and background have been made public, especially since he was an elite athlete, the victim has been able to remain unnamed and will continue to do so.

In a follow-up to her poignant 7,000-word letter to her assailant that threw a national spotlight on the case, she said in a statement to Bay Area Fox affiliate KTVU:

I remain anonymous, yes to protect my identity.

But it is also a statement, that all of these people are fighting for someone they don’t know.

That’s the beauty of it. I don’t need labels, categories to prove I am worthy of respect, to prove that I should be listened to.

I am coming out to you as simply a woman wanting to be heard. Yes there is plenty more I’d like to tell you about me.

For now I am every woman.

Her reason for remaining anonymous highlights one of the worst aspects of rape culture: that a woman has to be flawless — or from a certain background — to be a believable victim. Through her anonymity, the woman is saying it’s important that her story is understood not through the lens of who she is — her race, class, age, or other factor — but because she is a woman who went through a traumatic ordeal that so many other women have experienced.

As a nameless, faceless survivor, she represents other women who have been sexually assaulted and raped but were not afforded the benefit of the doubt because those identifying factors became public.

But why is it so difficult to believe that rape and sexual assault are as common as they are? About a fifth of all women in the United States experience rape. Meanwhile, false reports of such incidents are so rare — between 2 and 8 percent — that it is baffling that the first question about a rape accusation is whether the accuser is lying.

That question is often followed by an onslaught of queries about how the accuser may have influenced a man to assault her. As the victim in this case boldly said in her courtroom statement last week, she was asked these questions throughout the process to invalidate her integrity:

Did you drink in college? You said you were a party animal? How many times did you black out? Did you party at frats? Are you serious with your boyfriend? Are you sexually active with him? When did you start dating? Would you ever cheat? Do you have a history of cheating? What do you mean when you said you wanted to reward him? Do you remember what time you woke up? Were you wearing your cardigan? What color was your cardigan? Do you remember any more from that night? No? Okay, well, we’ll let Brock fill it in.

In a sign of how prevalent sexual assault is, and how many other people have had to field similar questions, this woman’s anonymity reminds onlookers that she could, sadly, be anyone.


Watch: 9 facts about violence against women everyone should know

Policy
Is Trump’s Justice Department trying to discredit itself?Is Trump’s Justice Department trying to discredit itself?
Policy

The DOJ used to avoid spectacles like the Louise Lucas raid.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
What the Supreme Court still has left to decide this termWhat the Supreme Court still has left to decide this term
Politics

Democracy and Donald Trump dominate the Court’s remaining docket.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court seems a bit nervous about letting the police track you with your phoneThe Supreme Court seems a bit nervous about letting the police track you with your phone
Politics

The justices were concerned that the Trump administration is asking for too much in a major police surveillance case.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Policy
Pam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerousPam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerous
Policy

The best thing about Bondi was her incompetence.

By Ian Millhiser
Culture
Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?
Culture

How the Epstein story became an American parable.

By Constance Grady