Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Why CTOs have been thinking about intelligence all wrong

“Don’t build it, buy it,” says one of the developers of IBM’s Watson supercomputer.

IBM Watson’s computer housing case in New York City.
IBM Watson’s computer housing case in New York City.
IBM Watson’s computer housing case in New York City.
Andrew Spear/ The Washington Post / Getty

Matters of machine intelligence are topics of great interest these days. In CTO circles, it’s all anyone talks about. It reminds me of a statement I read a couple years back from renowned technology writer and author Kevin Kelly: “The business plans of the next 10,000 startups are easy to forecast: Take X and add AI.” An interesting remark.

Although that prediction proved to be a bit off the mark (or perhaps it’s still too early for its time), the idea is certainly compelling.

For a better approach to making your company smarter, look to APIs.

Nearly every day I hear of a new startup announcing some new intelligence offering. It’s an exciting time to be in the industry. Finally, intelligence-as-a-service is a reality. Companies and organizations can buy intelligent systems and forgo the tremendous difficulty of building one from the ground up. For CTOs, the question they must answer now is how to incorporate intelligence platforms into their existing application stack. Simply put, how do they make their company smarter?

It is a difficult question, and many businesses are willing to throw money at the wall just to see what sticks. The truth is, there is a right and wrong way to go about it. Unfortunately, most CTOs are only aware of the wrong way. Here’s where I believe I can help.

First, let’s examine the wrong way. Traditionally, companies and CTOs who want to add intelligence to their applications will take a holistic approach, creating what is known as a data lake. This is done because of the need for context surrounding the data gathered from applications — the categorical information about particular points of data. The belief is that by capturing and organizing all data, businesses will be given a full 360-degree view of their users’ preferences, habits, etc. It’s a great payoff — in theory.

Companies may hire a team of data scientists who set out to build the data lake. Then, once that storage is in place and all the data is gathered, an intelligence application can parse it and draw new insights from the company’s data.

On a surface level, it seems very effective. Put all the data in one place, and then learn from it. Simple enough. Unfortunately, this strategy has a number of shortcomings. The first is that it can take years to implement. Building a data lake from scratch is a slow-moving and laborious endeavor. Secondly, a holistic approach to intelligence is inefficient. Hiring a team of data scientists and building a data lake is terribly expensive, and diverts valuable resources away from other priorities. The truth is, you really don’t need everything to do something. It’s much simpler!

Intelligence-as-a-service is no longer an impossible dream — it is available today.

For a better approach to making your company smarter, look to APIs. By placing an API layer in between your company’s applications and an intelligence-as-a-service provider (for example, IBM’s Watson), you can create smarter systems that provide top-notch analysis without the need of a data lake. APIs enable data to flow into the machine-learning system (since all interactions with the application happens through the APIs, the API traffic represents the totality of all signals about an app’s usage). But, more importantly, APIs represent a very simple way of taking action. Recommendations can be pushed, for example, as part of the API responses. Threats can be blocked in the API layer. APIs help close the loop.

Moreover, this approach is very efficient. APIs working between the applications and intelligence can quickly process and contextualize data, giving you responsive insight and the coveted 360-degree view of users. Not to mention that you can cut costs dramatically by not hiring a team of data scientists and building an expansive data lake.

Data science is hard, but data within an API layer is easy. Adding API layers between applications, and intelligence is already being done by dozens of companies, particularly those in retail.

The best advice I can give: Don’t build it, buy it.

Intelligence-as-a-service is no longer an impossible dream — it is available today. It can make your company smarter and give you an edge against competitors. Save the time, effort and investment by opting for an intelligence strategy that does not require any data lakes. Let nature do the lake building — use APIs and make your company smarter instead.



As CTO
of Apigee, Anant Jhingran leads product strategy and development at the company. He joined Apigee from IBM, where he was vice president and CTO for the company's Information Management Division. He also co-chaired the IBM Cloud Computing Architecture Board. At IBM, Jhingran was responsible for the technical strategy for databases, information integration, analytics and big data, and helped deliver IBM's platform-as-a-service (PaaS) capabilities. Reach him @jhingran.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh