Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Judge finds “substantial evidence” of even more racial discrimination by San Francisco police

Racial bias in policing isn’t isolated — it’s systemic.

The San Francisco Police Department is facing numerous racism allegations.
The San Francisco Police Department is facing numerous racism allegations.
The San Francisco Police Department is facing numerous racism allegations.
| Justin Sullivan via Getty Images

It just got a lot harder for the San Francisco Police Department to deny allegations of racism: A judge ruled on Thursday that there was “substantial evidence” of racial discrimination displayed in the department’s handling of drug stings.

US District Judge Edward Chen refused to dismiss claims of police racism filed by 12 black people facing drug charges after being arrested in San Francisco’s Tenderloin neighborhood, the San Francisco Chronicle reports. Records show police officers were overheard making racist references to black men and women. Evidence also showed selective arresting practices, including a videotape of officers arresting a black woman just after allegedly refusing a drug sale offer from an Asian-American woman nearby, whom they did not arrest.

“The evidence shows there are substantial numbers (and a substantial proportion) of drug dealers in the Tenderloin who are not African American; yet they were not stopped or arrested,” Chen said.

If found guilty of their actions in the Tenderloin, the officers in question could face dismissal. But recent scandals plaguing the department show these issues aren’t isolated — they’re systemic.

A series of officer-involved shootings and scrutiny for excessive use of force led to the resignation of former San Francisco Police Chief Greg Suhr last month. The department is also currently under scrutiny for two separate racist texting scandals.

Sure, these allegations make the police department look bad. But the racial biases Judge Chen identified have real consequences in policing and impact how police interact with the various communities they are expected to protect and serve.

The police brutality and texting scandals in San Francisco reflect a broader shared mistrust of police among citizens, especially among people of color, due to racial bias. In Los Angeles County, the sheriff’s chief of staff, Tom Angel, resigned days before Suhr over racist emails profiling Muslims and racist jokes about Mexicans and African Americans.

Following the death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, at the hands of local police officer Darren Wilson, the US Department of Justice launched an investigation into biased police practices there. Not only did the report yield a history of disproportionate punishment against Ferguson’s black citizens, but it also revealed several racist “joke” emails, including those that compared President Barack Obama to a monkey.

Studies have shown these attitudes have a direct impact on policing. A 2014 study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology revealed that white male officers largely tend to dehumanize African Americans. Research has also shown that racist stereotypes make it far more likely for Americans in general to mistakenly shoot a black person compared with a white person.

The San Francisco District Attorney’s office was already reviewing 4,000 cases that are connected to the officers involved in the first texting scandal. Another 200 cases are potentially being added to the docket for the second scandal.

Before his resignation, Suhr announced that San Francisco’s law enforcement officers will be required to undergo anti-bias training. As more evidence surfaces, that may be the least the embattled department can do if it wants to save itself.


Watch: The racism of the US criminal justice system

Policy
Is Trump’s Justice Department trying to discredit itself?Is Trump’s Justice Department trying to discredit itself?
Policy

The DOJ used to avoid spectacles like the Louise Lucas raid.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
What the Supreme Court still has left to decide this termWhat the Supreme Court still has left to decide this term
Politics

Democracy and Donald Trump dominate the Court’s remaining docket.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court seems a bit nervous about letting the police track you with your phoneThe Supreme Court seems a bit nervous about letting the police track you with your phone
Politics

The justices were concerned that the Trump administration is asking for too much in a major police surveillance case.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Policy
Pam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerousPam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerous
Policy

The best thing about Bondi was her incompetence.

By Ian Millhiser
Culture
Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?
Culture

How the Epstein story became an American parable.

By Constance Grady