Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

YouTube says its software let content owners make $1 billion in the last year — so the music labels should stop complaining

Now it’s your turn to respond, Taylor Swift.

Taylor Swift The 1989 World Tour Live In Los Angeles - Night 3
Taylor Swift The 1989 World Tour Live In Los Angeles - Night 3
Christopher Polk / Getty
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

Here’s the latest salvo in the back and forth between YouTube and the music industry: A report from Google that says its video site’s copyright software has allowed content owners to generate $1 billion in the last year or so.

Or, in other words: Hey, music guys! Stop moaning about money — we’re making plenty of it for you.

Google’s formal message comes via “How Google Fights Piracy,” a 62-page mega-pamphlet it is releasing today.

Google has published the report before. The new part is that it says its Content ID tool, which lets copyright owners “claim” videos users upload to YouTube so they can get some of the ad revenue those clips generate, has created $2 billion for copyright owners since 2007.

The last time Google put out the report, in late 2014, it pegged that number at $1 billion. So that’s a rapid, significant increase.

Not all of that money gets distributed to music owners, since Content ID works for any kind of video.

But a blog post that accompanies the report makes it quite clear that Google is responding to the music industry, which has spent the past few months complaining that YouTube doesn’t pay them enough and that Content ID isn’t a solution.

“Half of the music industry’s YouTube revenue comes from fan content claimed via Content ID,” writes Katie Oyama, a Google policy lawyer.

So what do you want to say about that, Taylor Swift?

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh