Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Morning Consult Poll: if today were Election Day, Clinton would be president

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks during a campaign rally with US President Barack Obama on July 5, 2016, in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks during a campaign rally with US President Barack Obama on July 5, 2016, in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks during a campaign rally with US President Barack Obama on July 5, 2016, in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

With a little less than four months until the 2016 presidential election, there’s a lot of speculation about its outcome. But new findings suggest that if the election weren’t four months away, and instead were held today, America would have its first woman president.

A survey released Thursday by Morning Consult found that as of now, Hillary Clinton would have 320 Electoral College votes to Donald Trump’s 212 (excluding six votes from Iowa). To put that in perspective, Barack Obama won in 2008 with 365 electoral votes and with 332 in 2012. A minimum of 270 votes is needed to secure the presidency.

MapUpdatedGraphic.0.png

The nonpartisan media and technology company conducted a survey among 57,000 registered voters in all 50 states and Washington, DC, to predict which candidate would win a plurality in each place. Looking at electoral votes can often be more useful than national polls because ultimately what decides the election is the number of electoral votes each candidate accumulates.

Morning Consult’s last similar survey, conducted in April, similarly predicted that Trump would lose to Clinton (as would Ted Cruz). According to the study, John Kasich, who had little name recognition and was seen by many as a generic Republican candidate, had the best chance of securing the White House. Kasich dropped out of the race back in May with a meager 161 delegates.

Eight states were considered toss-ups in the most recent survey: Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Maine, Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

Since April, the preferences of a few of these states have shifted toward Trump. Wisconsin went from being a dark blue state to being a light blue state (from 37.9 percent in favor of Trump to 39.4), as did New Hampshire (39 percent in favor of Trump to 40.5). Clinton also appears to be losing ground in Ohio, with Trump’s support rising slightly from 40.4 to 41.7 percent — though those numbers are well within most polls’ margin of error.

Iowa, where Clinton held an advantage in April, is now in a dead heat with Trump at 40.1 percent for each candidate. Previously, Clinton held the state 44.7 to 38.1 percent. Because of the closeness in percentage this time around, Iowa was not included in Morning Consult’s electoral vote count.

According to the survey, Trump’s greatest victory is the solidification of Indiana, where he now holds an 11-point advantage over Clinton — though traditionally Indiana tends to go Republican in national elections.

The findings showed improvement for Clinton in certain states. Georgia, which was a firmly red state back in April (with Trump winning 45.3 to Clinton’s 39 percent) is now leaning toward Clinton (42.8 to Trump’s 41.8 percent). Nevada is also a darker blue than it was in April, with Clinton now holding the support of 43.5 percent of the voters to Trump’s 39.6.

Though Clinton might the hypothetical election if it were held today, much can happen between now and Election Day. As GOP strategist Chris Sinclair said to the Wall Street Journal, “Can Hillary Clinton win? Absolutely. Is she a shoo-in? No.”

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters