Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Do you want a verified account on Twitter? Now you can apply.

And Twitter will decide if you are a person of public interest.

Are you a person of public interest? Twitter wants to hear from you!

For years, Twitter has verified the identity of some of its most publicly influential users by placing a small, blue check mark next to their name. It was never entirely clear how these people were picked — it seemed like you were either a movie star with a competent publicist or it was one of those “you have to know someone who knows someone” kinda things.

That is no longer the case. On Tuesday, Twitter started taking applications from users who want to verify their account.

You’ll need to send in some info as part of the application, like your birth date and phone number, and you need to have an actual photo on your profile. Twitter may require more verification, too, like a copy of a government-issued ID.

If it sounds silly that people might flock to Twitter to hand over things like their phone number and birthday for a small blue check, you might be right. But there are benefits, especially if you are a major celebrity or someone whom others on the service might want to impersonate. (This happens even if you are verified, and it can be tragic.) There are also lots of bot accounts on Twitter, and this can help separate the real people and organizations from the machines.

There’s also a bit of vanity about it. Only 187,000 people are verified on Twitter, out of 310 million. So a blue check mark is exclusive, and exclusive things are fun to have.

We still don’t know how Twitter picks which accounts are “of public interest” and which are not. Why are most Recode reporters verified, but some (*cough* Mark Bergen *cough*) not? It’s hard to say. But at least now you can apply and Twitter will let you know if you’re worthy or not.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh