Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Donald Trump’s “Muslim ban” now includes anyone from France

We’re going to have an unbelievable ban. The best.
We’re going to have an unbelievable ban. The best.
We’re going to have an unbelievable ban. The best.
Jeff Swensen/Getty Images

Donald Trump is doubling down on some of his most controversial policy proposals.

In a Sunday interview on NBC’s Meet the Press — his first since accepting the Republican nomination — Trump appeared largely unfazed by criticisms that his convention and his keynote address were “a little dark.”

Instead, he spoke about expanding the scope of a proposed travel ban that would bar Muslims from entering the country. Back in 2015, he proposed “a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States,” but now it seems he wants to take that ban even further.

“I’m looking now at territories,” he explained. “People were so upset when I used the word Muslim. Oh, you can’t use the word Muslim. Remember this. And I’m okay with that, because I’m talking territory instead of Muslim.”

Trump said he would specifically target countries “compromised by terrorism.” Though he didn’t explain the system that his administration would use to classify which countries would be subject to such a ban, he hinted that nations like France and Germany might fit the bill.

“It’s their own fault,” he said, presumably referring to the French government, “because they’ve allowed people over years to come into their territory.”

In addition to reiterating his support for tighter immigration control, Trump also stood by his past criticisms of intergovernmental agreements and treaties.

Last week, in an interview with the New York Times, Trump shocked the international community by insinuating that under his leadership, the United States might not honor the terms of NATO’s military alliance in the event of Russian aggression. Talking to Meet the Press host Chuck Todd on Sunday, he dug into that position:

All I’m saying is they have to pay. Now, a country gets invaded, they haven’t paid, everyone says, “Oh, but we have a treaty.” Well, they have a treaty too. They’re supposed to be paying. We have countries within NATO that are taking advantage of us. With me, I believe they’re going to pay. And when they pay, I’m a big believer in NATO.

But if they don’t pay, we don’t have — you know, Chuck, this isn’t 40 years ago. This isn’t 50 years ago. It’s not 30 years ago. We’re a different country today. We’re much weaker, our military is depleted, we owe tremendous amounts of money. We have to be reimbursed. We can no longer be the stupid country.

But under a Trump presidency, NATO wouldn’t be the only international agreement possibly on the chopping block. Over the course of the interview, Trump also questioned the US’s involvement in the North American Free Trade Agreement and the World Trade Organization, calling both “disasters.” In particular, he spent quite a bit of time railing against the WTO, arguing that if the organization objected to some of his protectionist trade policies, the United States would have to consider “pulling out.”

Trump’s Meet the Press comments have garnered him strong rebukes from both economists and policymakers.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters