Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Google wants the court to sanction the Oracle lawyer who revealed Google’s $1 billion search deal with Apple

It’s the case that never ends.

Supreme Court Delivers Decisions Against Aereo And Rules In Favor Of Cellphone Privacy
Supreme Court Delivers Decisions Against Aereo And Rules In Favor Of Cellphone Privacy
Win McNamee / Getty

The protracted copyright case between Google and Oracle produced a very revealing tidbit: How much Google paid Apple for its position as a search provider on iPhones.

That fact — where Google forked over $1 billion in 2014 — was revealed by Oracle’s lawyer Annette Hurst in court in January and dutifully documented by Bloomberg.

Google, which won the case in May, thinks the revelation violated court rules and that Oracle should pay for it. Fortune flagged the legal filing from last week, wherein Google asks the case’s judge to sanction Hurst for the disclosure of the financial terms, which Google claims were “extremely confidential” and shielded from the public under a legal “protective order.”

It’s not super important if the move results in a legal slap — as Fortune points out, the odds are low and most sanctions would be immaterial to Oracle. But the filing shows the lengths Google goes to keep details on its search business, particularly its lucrative arrangement with Apple, under wraps.

Per Bloomberg, Hurst also said in court that Google and Apple had a revenue-sharing agreement of 34 percent, although we don’t know which party is doing the bulk of the sharing.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh