Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Trump is beating Romney in the Southwest but doing worse than him in the Midwest

Donald Trump Meets With Congressional Republicans In Washington DC
Donald Trump Meets With Congressional Republicans In Washington DC
Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images

For all the fuss that’s been made over Donald Trump, manufacturing, the white working class, and the Rust Belt, the latest poll analysis from Nate Silver has Trump doing worse than Mitt Romney in Ohio, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Minnesota.

In part, that’s simply because Trump is broadly unpopular. But his weakness in the Midwest is partially offset by the fact that he’s doing better than Romney in a cluster of Southwestern states, including Nevada, Colorado, and New Mexico:

If the Republican nominee were Marco Rubio, the straightforward explanation would be that his ethnic background plus his embrace of comprehensive immigration reform was helping him outperform Romney in states with large Hispanic populations but was hurting him with Midwestern white working-class voters.

But of course the Republican nominee isn’t Marco Rubio — it’s Donald Trump.

Still, it’s the case that his strongest swing states are ones with large Latino populations in the Southwest, where, one can assume, he is benefiting from a white backlash against growing Latino political power.

Trump is also massively outperforming Romney in a series of deep blue Northeastern states — Connecticut (11.3 points), New York (6.7 points), New Jersey (6.4 points) — where politics has long been deeply racialized and where local Republicans are relatively non-ideological.

The Midwestern industrial states that are supposedly the locus of the economic anxiety that allegedly fueled Trump’s rise, however, seem to actually find him less congenial than Romney — for the perhaps obvious reason that, unlike Romney, Trump lacks any kind of conventional qualification for high office.

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s brazen plan for a $1.7 billion slush fundTrump’s brazen plan for a $1.7 billion slush fund
The Logoff

Trump will reportedly drop his IRS lawsuit — for a price.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
The rise of the progressive billionaire candidateThe rise of the progressive billionaire candidate
Politics

Why some on the left are feeling warmly toward Tom Steyer and other very wealthy contenders.

By Andrew Prokop
Politics
Mifepristone survives another Supreme Court scare — for nowMifepristone survives another Supreme Court scare — for now
Politics

Only Thomas and Alito publicly dissented.

By Ian Millhiser
Podcasts
Why the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in TrumpWhy the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in Trump
Podcast
Podcasts

Trump helped overturn Roe. Anti-abortion advocates still aren’t happy.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
A year of Trump is backfiring on the religious rightA year of Trump is backfiring on the religious right
Politics

Americans don’t really want “Christian nationalism.”

By Christian Paz
Politics
The real reason Americans hate the economy so muchThe real reason Americans hate the economy so much
Politics

Did decades of low inflation make the public far more unforgiving when it finally did surge?

By Andrew Prokop