Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Facebook says humans won’t write its trending topic descriptions anymore

The company is still fighting the claim it suppressed conservative news content.

Shutterstock / Willyam Bradberry

It has been more than three months since Gizmodo first published a story claiming Facebook’s human editors were suppressing conservative news content on the site’s Trending Topics section. Facebook vehemently denied the report, but has been dealing with the story’s aftermath ever since.

On Friday, Facebook announced another small but notable change to Trending Topics: Human editors will no longer write the short story descriptions that accompany a trending topic on the site. Instead, Facebook is going to use algorithms to “pull excerpts directly from stories.”

Facebook

It is not, however, cutting out humans entirely. In fact, Facebook employees will still select which stories ultimately make it into the trending section. An algorithm will surface popular stories, but Facebook editors will weed out the inappropriate or fake ones. “There are still people involved in this process to ensure that the topics that appear in Trending remain high-quality,” the company’s blog reads.

Facebook says automating story descriptions will help it expand Trending Topics to more countries and languages. But that wasn’t the catalyst here. “This is something we always planned to do but we are making these changes sooner given the feedback we got from the Facebook community earlier this year,” the post reads.

That’s as close as you’ll get to Facebook attributing this change to Gizmodo’s report.

At the heart of all this drama is the fact that consumer companies like Facebook and Twitter and Snapchat are all walking a fine line between being a neutral platform to host news, and a subjective media company that creates it.

Facebook and Twitter, for example, both use algorithms to surface some user posts, but suppress others. Those algorithms are human-generated, and thus inherently biased. Snapchat and Twitter are using human editors to create event recaps, including summaries of breaking news events.

So humans impact what you do and do not see on these services, and the challenge, especially for Facebook, is making it clear how involved these humans actually are. Hence Friday’s update.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Future Perfect
How to fall in love with humanity againHow to fall in love with humanity again
Future Perfect

Tech culture has made contempt for humanity feel enlightened. We can do better.

By Sigal Samuel
America, Actually
Inside the fight over America’s data centersInside the fight over America’s data centers
Podcast
America, Actually

“The ugliest thing I’ve ever seen”: How New Jersey residents feel about a data center in their backyard.

By Astead Herndon
Podcasts
Could you spot an AI-written book?Could you spot an AI-written book?
Podcast
Podcasts

An author set up an experiment to find out.

By Amina Al-Sadi and Noel King
Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol