Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

More than two million people watched Twitter’s NFL stream on Thursday night

And 48 million watched it on regular TV.

Kurt Wagner / Recode

More than two million people watched Thursday night’s football game between the Buffalo Bills and New York Jets for free on Twitter.

That was smaller than the digital audience Yahoo saw when it streamed an NFL game, also for free, last October (though Yahoo autoplayed that game on its homepage and most of its properties, including mail and Tumblr, so the comparison isn’t clean at all). It’s also well below the 48.1 million who tuned in to watch the game on TV, according to Nielsen.

Here are more relevant numbers, if you really want to compare Twitter’s reach vs. traditional TV: An average of 243,000 people were watching the game on Twitter at any given time, while CBS and the NFL network, which simulcast the game, reached an average of 15.4 million.

No one expected Twitter to generate TV-level numbers, of course. Streaming the game digitally, for free, is still a big experiment for all parties involved.

But the audience total is a good benchmark to use for the NFL — and for Twitter investors — as the season plays out. Thursday’s game was the first of 10 games Twitter is set to stream for free over the next three months.

Twitter’s average audience number was calculated using a rating metric known as average minute audience, or the average number of viewers calculated per minute during the game. This is also how Nielsen analyzes data for TV ratings, so the numbers should be comparable.

That means Twitter’s metrics are more TV-like than the all-over-the-map digital metrics for videos, like total streams (which Yahoo used last year). That’s a rarity, but it should become more common if the digital video guys want to get taken seriously.

What we still don’t know — and probably won’t know for some time — is whether these streams will generate any new users for Twitter. The company has just over 300 million total users, and hasn’t been growing much at all over the past year. The streaming deal with the NFL is a chance to change that by luring folks without Twitter accounts to the service with something they do like: NFL football.

But you don’t need a Twitter account to watch the NFL on Twitter, which means Twitter will need to find a way to convince visitors that it’s worth signing up for an account. The company isn’t breaking out how many of Thursday’s viewers were active users.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh