Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

YouTube wants to sell more video ads — by pulling ads off of some of its videos

The world’s biggest video site explains why “demonetizing” videos is a good thing. Video makers freak out.

Roberto Machado Noa / Getty Contributor
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

YouTube has a plan to generate more advertising revenue for its videos — by pulling ads off of some of its videos.

The world’s biggest video site wants to make its inventory more attractive to advertisers, by preemptively flagging some videos that have “non-advertising-friendly content.”

Or, in YouTube’s words, “demonetizing” them.

YouTube says it has been doing this for some time. But this week the practice became controversial, chiefly because longtime YouTube star Philip DeFranco noticed that several of his videos weren’t running with ads.

His response: “YouTube Is Shutting Down My Channel,” a clip where he worries that “it looks like they’re trying to push some of us off the site.”

A YouTube rep says the only thing that’s new here is that YouTube is doing a better job of telling YouTube creators that their videos aren’t running with ads — in part so they can appeal the move and try to get them reinstalled:

“While our policy of demonetizing videos due to advertiser-friendly concerns hasn’t changed, we’ve recently improved the notification and appeal process to ensure better communication to our creators.”

YouTube also says that only 1 percent of “partner videos” that it sells ads for, like DeFranco’s, have been “demonetized.” (Yup, they really say that.)

YouTube’s perspective here is a reasonable one, particularly since advertisers have long worried that they didn’t know what they were buying when they bought YouTube ads. For a slightly longer version of this argument check out this post by Defy Media president Keith Richman, whose company delivers the Smosh dudes and lots of other content to YouTube.

The counter is that, like lots of tech companies, YouTube is opaque about how its flagging process works, and what kind of stuff really qualifies as “non-advertising-friendly content.”

It’s possible to read this stay-away list, which includes everything from “sexual humor” to “controversial or sensitive subjects,” and conclude that YouTube really doesn’t want to sell ads on anything at all. Since YouTube is very much interested in selling ads, it might want to figure out a better way of communicating this to the people who generate lots of content.

It’s also worth noting that this comes as YouTube faces increasing competition for video views and the people who make videos.

Twitter just announced it is going to start sharing ad dollars with content makers, but will offer them a better revenue split than YouTube does. Facebook has yet to create a YouTube-like revenue sharing program for the Phil DeFrancos of the world, but is certainly thinking about it. Snapchat, too.

And if you’re not in the ad business at all, like IAC’s Vimeo, now’s a good time to remind people that there are other ways to make money from video. Which they have done here.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh